Instructions for Reviewers / Editors
Revised: 25 February 2013
Copyright: (c) 2012-13, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.
PathologyOutlines.com is the world's most popular pathology website with 13,000+ visits each weekday. We want it to be more authoritative, while still being free, fast and easy to use. These guidelines should be followed when reviewing/updating our 6600+ topics. Remember that our mission is to provide information of use or of interest to pathologists who are signing out cases, and other members of the pathology community. Although we provide an honorarium to reviewers (not editors), those looking solely for extra income should look elsewhere, because our rates are much less than a pathologist earns in clinical practice. To comply with US tax laws, we will require you to complete some paperwork, and unfortunately, we must withhold 30% of payments from non-US contributors and send it to the US government.
Editors assign topics to reviewers they know, and oversee their work. If editors want to review/update a topic themselves, they should let us know. In general, we prefer at least two pathologists outside PathologyOutlines.com to review any topic. Let us know if you want to combine, split, add or remove topics. In general, we prefer redundancy, so pathologists can find information quickly and not get frustrated (we can add links so material doesn’t have to be written twice). When a topic is completed, send it back to us. We will format and post it, and ask you to review it again (topics look different when they are part of the website).
We would like reviewers to:
(1) update the topic with new information and new references
(2) ensure that the topic contains material necessary for or interesting to practicing pathologists
(3) correct any substantive errors or text that is incomplete or difficult to understand
(4) add images (your own, or links to other free webpages) or diagrams as needed
Our goal is to make each topic an authoritative source of the entity. We will email you a link to the topic as it currently exists, and ask you to email us an itemized list of your suggested changes. After we have incorporated the changes, you will have another opportunity to review the topic, until you are satisfied. If you are deleting information, please tell us why.
Our online textbook is different than a written textbook. We have a standard format so visitors can find information quickly, and the topics are easy to read. For that reason, we have intentionally formatted our topics to be in “outline” format, with bullet points and short sentences. If you believe a sentence is ambiguous, please let us know, but your job is NOT to change the format to one you prefer. Please make sure most material is of interest to practicing pathologists. This means you do not have to include every immunostain published about an entity - just those likely to be important to pathologists. Before adding a new category of data, please check whether it is already included within another topic. Please ONLY do topics you are assigned.
Pathologists want ready access to abstracts or full text for the most important journal articles, and also to know that that each topic incorporates the most recent literature. Reviewers should search PubMed for articles posted since the last review, including Am J Surg Pathol, Mod Pathol, Am J Clin Pathol, Arch Pathol Lab Med and Hum Pathol. Of course, other journals and older articles may also be important. We like to include references from journals with free full text in English, since many pathologists cannot afford subscriptions. For rare topics, there may only be a few journal articles at all - we prefer some citations, even if older or in a foreign language. We prefer references to be next to the text they support, not listed at the end of the topic.
We prefer that each topic have several diagnostic microscopic images. Images can be from your own collection or links to website pages that do not require registration or a subscription (send us the link to the page, not just the image). We prefer links to medical journals or educational websites, which tend to be more stable, not to personal or commercial sites (which tend to change). Do NOT include links to sites that sell images - they may threaten people just for linking. If you want to include your own images, please upload them to http://www.flickr.com/groups/pathologyoutlines/, and include the appropriate descriptive information, and send us a link in the Flickr page in the appropriate section of the topic. Websites that we find useful for images include: PathologyOutlines.com (particularly helpful for related entities), AFIP third fascicle (not online, but we have many digital images from this source), PathoPics, PEIR, PubCan.org, Webpathology.com, Wikipedia (for common entities), and free full text journals. It is usually helpful to include H&E images at low and high power, relevant immunostains, and to the extent relevant to the topic, clinical images (Xrays, intraoperative, patient lesions), gross images, molecular / cytogenetic images, and EM images.
We usually send out 3-4 topics initially. After you have edited those topics and returned them to us, we will make sure that your editing meets our expectations. If so, we will send you more topics to review in the same section. We would like you to finish within 3-4 weeks of receipt. If you need more time, please let us know. If you are unable to review as much as you thought, just let us know.
After completing the review, we will post your name on the topics reviewed. We will also post your name, contact information and a "head shot" on our Reviewers/Authors page. We pay an honorarium to those who review at least 5 topics. The honorarium is $500 per chapter or pro-rated by the amount of topics in the chapter completed. Payment is by check or PayPal only. If you reside in the U.S. and receive $600 or more per year from us, we will issue you a 1099 form in February of the next year, and will need your social security number or tax identification number. We typically will contact you one year or so after the chapter with your topics was completed to see if you want to review the topic(s) again.
Order of sections:
For ease of use, we put sections in the same order in each topic. Note that each section may not be relevant for each topic, and there is some overlap of the topics. We do NOT want sections to contain obvious or repetitive information – leave them blank if there is nothing to include. If there is only one sentence in several sections, we may combine them.
A 1-2 sentence summary of the topic
Other names used today or historically that pathologists may be more familiar with
Who gets this lesion – age, gender, geographic location, very strong causal connections (example – Kaposi’s sarcoma and HIV, HHV8); weaker associations are listed under clinical features)
Parts of the body typically affected
How the lesion / tumor arises (if not obvious)
Causes of the lesion
Anything not included above. Includes associations with other conditions
Diagnostic criteria, supportive clinical or laboratory tests
Typical findings (positive or negative)
Typical findings (positive or negative)
For stains / biomarkers – what part of the cell stains (cytoplasm, nucleus, Golgi), and any typical staining patterns (diffuse, dot-like)
Uses by Pathologists:
For stains / biomarkers – how are these tests typically used by practicing pathologists. For many markers, there is “no current use by Pathologists”
Favorable or unfavorable prognostic factors for a condition.
The format is typically “25 year old man with coexisting zzz (reference).” We prefer 2-3 case reports, if possible, per topic. We also prefer references from free full text journals / websites, so pathologists can review the entire article.
General modes of treatment. Drug dosages are usually not necessary – if you want to include them, please provide a reference.
This includes radiologic images, intraoperative images, images of the patient, but NOT gross images
Description of the excised specimen
Images of the excised specimen
Patterns and cytologic features, common and uncommon. Associated features. Classification systems may be included here or under clinical features.
Low and high power, stains; if unavailable at this body site, you can include from another site with similar features.
Cytologic features and limitations.
Peripheral smear description / images:
For hematopathology, or as relevant
List most commonly used first. If not uniformly positive, provide percentage of cases. List staining patterns if uncommon.
List most commonly used first
Flow cytometry description / images:
For hematopathology, or as relevant
Electron microscopy descriptions / images:
Molecular / cytogenetics descriptions / images:
Includes idiotypes, karyogram, FISH, PCR gels
links to YouTube or other sites.
Include names of entities and most important differentiating features. We will link to the topic on our site.
General references for this topic. A reference used frequently throughout a chapter will be posted on the main chapter page.
-- End --
If you are interested in being a reviewer, please email your CV and the chapter / topics you want to review to Dr. Nat Pernick, 248/646-0325, NatPernick@Hotmail.com or NatPernick@gmail.com.