Home   Chapter Home   Jobs   Conferences    Fellowships    Books



Advertisement

Molecular Pathology


Author: Rodney E. Shackelford, D.O., Ph.D. (see Reviewers page)
Revised: 22 September 2012, last major update April 2012
Copyright: (c) 2008-2011, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

Table of contents - Molecular Pathology

DNA purification: introductionanalyzing puritybasic protocolanion exchange chromatographycesium chloride density gradient centrifugationcommercial DNA extraction machinesethanol precipitationorganic extractionPCR inhibitorsRNA purificationsilica adsorptiontissue preparation

DNA sequencing: historyMaxam-Gilbert sequencingSanger sequencingcapillary electrophoresisother innovationsreal timepyroseqencingnanotechnologyRoche 454 FLX pyrosequencerIllumina Genome AnalyzerHeliScope Sequencer

FISH: general,  probes,  protocol,  probe patterns,  images

 

Microarray: introductionhistory,  basicsconsiderationserrors

variations: antibodybead basedcellularCGHsolid phasetissue (TMA) 

 

PCR: definition,  historybasics,  Taq polymerasereaction stagesthermocyclers  applications 

variations: generalmethylation specificmultiplexnestedreal-timereverse transcriptase 

 

 

Fluorescent in situ Hybridization (FISH)

FISH-general - Molecular Pathology chapter

top   Home Page

Used to visualize chromosomal deletions, amplifications, structural rearrangements and to identify whole chromosomes

Advantages: relative ease of sample preparation and analysis, high specificity, no requirement that the cells analyzed be activity dividing, can be performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples (allowing comparison of probe hybridization patterns to histology)

Applications: prenatal diagnosis and genetic counseling, oncology (especially chromosomal translocations), basic research, gene mapping, species identification of pathogens

Specimen types: solid tumors, bone marrow aspirates, peripheral blood (lymphocytes), amniotic fluid (amniocytes), skin (fibroblasts),  chorionic villi

Uses interphase cells (non-cultured) or cultured cells in metaphase (culture + colcemid to block cells in metaphase)

History: FISH development followed development of cytogenetics

1882 - Walter Flemming published the first illustrations of human chromosomes

1956 - Identification of 46 human chromosomes

1959 - Identification of trisomy 21 in Down’s syndrome

1959 - Identification of XXY in Klinefelter's Syndrome (Nature 1959;183:302)

1959 - Identification of XO in Turner’s syndrome (Lancet 1959;1(7075):711)

1960 - Identification of Philadelphia Chromosome in chronic myelogenous leukemia (J Clin Invest 2007;117:2033)

1960’s - karyotype analysis now common, particularly with advent of dyes that reveal banding patterns specific to each chromosome pair

Later - radiolabeled probes used to bind to specific chromosomal sequences, leading to first molecular cytogenetic analyses of human tissue

FISH became common after development of fluorescent labeled nucleic acid probes

Currently 1 million+ cytogenetic analyses performed worldwide every year

FISH can be performed on tissue imprints, cytopreps, or bone marrow aspirate smears (J Clin Pathol 2005;58:629)

Ultrasound decalcification may allow more successful FISH, PCR and RT-PCR (AJSP 2006;30:892)

FISH can establish dizygotic origin of twin pregnancies if there are gender differences (Hum Path 1995;26:1175)
Sources for FISH test (advertisements): Propath

FISH probes - Molecular Pathology chapter

top   Home Page

Like most assays involving nucleic acid binding and detection, the specificity of FISH depends on the nucleotide sequence of the probe and the stringency of the annealing and washing conditions used

Nucleic acid types

Double stranded DNA probes: more common; require denaturation prior to application and often reanneal to each other, lowering their effectiveness

Single stranded DNA probes

Oligodeoxyribonucleotide probes: usually short, up to 100 base pairs

RNA probes: usually single stranded complementary to target nucleic acid sequence; can be very specific but are easily degraded by mild alkaline conditions or Rnases, as are RNA target hybridization sequences

Detection types

Fluorescent probes: most common, includes rhodamine, Texas red and fluorescein; used in most current assays; useful because require no secondary detection reagents, can be stored for relatively long periods, have strong signals with fluorescent excitation

Enzymatic probes: includes digoxygenin-antidigoxygenin, biotin-streptavidin; works well but often has high background signals; analysis is limited by short half lives of enzymatic activities

Radioactive probes: used in early studies, includes 3H and 32P; cumbersome to use, take days-weeks to complete, require extra safety precautions and are limited by radioactive decay of probes

Target types

Bind specific sequences (or locus-specific FISH): bind one nucleotide sequence found at one chromosomal region or specific to a few diseases; also used to identify deletions (with another probe used as a positive control) or amplifications of specific gene sequences; examples - BCR/ABL fusion transcript due to t(9;22)(q43;q11.2) in CML

Bind unique sequences: bind unique sequences found on different chromosomes, such as centromeric and subtelomeric regions; used to identify chromosomal changes in malignancy, birth defects or developmental delay

Whole chromosome probes: collections of many probes, each specific for different regions of each chromosome and each labeled with a different fluorophore, which together gives each chromosome a unique color; used to locate translocations difficult to otherwise identify

Probe Length: ranges from short oligonucleotides of 100 base pairs to nucleic acid sequences over 1 million base pairs; probe must be large enough to bind specifically to target, but not so large that its size interferes with efficient hybridization; optimal probe size depends on its target sequence - specific unique target sequences require shorter probe sequences but large target sequences (chromosomal deletions over large areas) often need larger probes

Probe Sequence and Target Binding: based on sequence from human genome project, grown in bacteria containing plasmids with specific sequences

 

FISH protocol - Molecular Pathology chapter

top   Home Page

Goal is to identify targets with high specificity, although research projects seeking related sequences intentionally use lower specificity

FISH employs three sequential steps: (a) sample fixation, (b) probe denaturation and hybridization, (c) several washing steps

Fixation: requires that sample is fixed to microscope slide so it does not wash off, but loose enough to allow probe-target hybridization

Probe denaturation and hybridization: usually marked excess of probe to target sequence is used to insure complete target binding; stringency of binding is manipulated using salt and detergent concentrations, temperature, and hybridization time; hybridization volumes are relatively low (10 to 20 ul), to minimize volume of expensive probes

Hybridization temperatures are typically 37° to 60° C in buffers containing 50% formamide and SSC buffer

Tissue samples are usually pretreated with proteases, appropriate nucleases, and other reagents to remove sample constituents that might interfere with FISH (examples - RNase pretreatment to remove RNA from hybridization to DNA, proteolysis of DNases or RNases to avoid probe degradation, DNase pretreatment to remove DNA from reactions hybridizing probe to sample RNA)

 

FISH Probe patterns - Molecular Pathology chapter

top   Home Page

Following hybridization and washing, most probes are visualized by fluorescence when subjected to the proper excitation light wavelengths

Absence of signal: indicates deletion of the probe target (but need proper controls)

Extra signals: may indicate trisomy or other aneuploidy

Fusion signal: two different fluorophores in close proximity often emit a third color (example red and green together emit yellow)

examples: mantle cell lymphoma has diagnostic t(11;14)(q13;q32), which juxtaposes the 11q13 BCL1 gene locus next to the 14q32 immunoglobin sequence; if one locus is labeled green and the other red, a yellow signal indicates the translocation, but separate green and red signals means no translocation

Split Signal Fluorescence: differently labeled probes flank a region broken in a specific translocation; with red and green probes but no translocation, two yellow signals will be seen (unaffected chromosomes), but with the translocation, separate green and red signals will be seen

Sub-Deletion Signal Fluorescence: two differently labeled probes are used; red and green probes may be located flanking different possibly deleted areas; no deletion - 2 yellow signals; 1 deletion - one yellow signal and one red or green signal; examples include

Prader-Willi/Angelman, Cri-du-Chat, Williams, and Steroid Sulfatase Deficiency syndrome

 

FISH images - Molecular Pathology chapter

top   Home Page

 

Breast cancer:

Breast carcinoma and HER2 amplification - IHC, CISH and FISHFISH amplification #1;  #2#3#4IHC and FISH #1#2#3not amplified-FISHnot amplified-CISH and FISHHER2 and TOP2A (see Breast-malignant chapter)

Breast medullary carcinoma - FISH and IHC show HER2 amplification in high grade invasive ductal carcinoma (figures A/B), but not in medullary carcinoma (figures C/D)

Breast secretory carcinoma - t(12;15)

Breast cancer during pregnancy - FISH shows cells from male fetuses within tumor

 

Kidney tumors:

Congenital mesoblastic nephroma - cellular subtype has t(12;15)(p13;q25) translocation, results in ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene, figures E and F 

Renal papillary adenoma - trisomy 12

 

Leukemia/lymphoma:

Acute myelogenous leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22) - H&E, cytogenetics and FISHH&E, RT-PCR and FISH 

Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12) - skin infiltration-various H&E and FISHnegative and positive control of t(15;17)

Anaplastic large cell lymphoma - t(2;5)(p23;q35), fusion of ALK and NPM - rib tumor

Burkitt’s lymphoma - t(8;14)(q24;q32.3), fusion of c-myc and IgH or t(8;22)(q24;q11), fusion of c-myc and lambda light chain - figures

CLL / SLL - trisomy 12, FISH shows three green signals in 2 cells on right sidetrisomy 12 (figures 5a, 6)

Mantle cell lymphoma - t(11;14)(q13;q32), fusion of BCL1/cyclin D1 and IgH - FISHH&E, stains, FISH

Mantle cell lymphoma - t(8;14)(q24;q32.3), fusion of c-myc and IgH (rare),  figure 4A

Myeloid neoplasm associated with PDGFRB rearrangement - rearrangement of PDGFRB - #1#2

Myeloid neoplasm associated with FGFR1 rearrangement - FISH assay of FIM (also called ZNF198) and FGFR1

PreB ALL with t(9;22)(q34;q11) - contributed by Dr. Julia Braza, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (USA) - bcr-abl FISH probe  

 

FISH images - Molecular Pathology chapter (continued)

top   Home Page

 

Soft tissue and bone tumors:

Chondroma - FISH with HMGA2 rearrangement

DFSP related sarcomas - COL1A1-PDGFB fusion gene - H&E and FISH

Infantile (congenital) fibrosarcoma - t(12;15)(p13;q25), fusion of ETV6 and NTRK3 - ideogram and FISH

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor - ALK staining, FISH and karyotype;  FISH for ALK

Pigmented villonodular synovitis - trisomy 5 and 7

Synovial sarcoma - t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2), fusion of SYT and SSX1 or SSX2 - FISHFISH and karyotype; heart tumor - COBRA-FISH karyogram with t(X;18) as part of complex karyotype

 

Other tumors:

Glioblastoma (pediatric) - molecular changes - various

Glioblastoma multiforme - EGFR amplification by FISH 

Intravenous leiomyomatosis - t(12;14)(q14-15;q23-24), fusion of HMGA2/HMGIC and various - intravenous leiomyomatosis

Lung carcinoma and Kras mutation - H&E and FISH of Kras mutation

Ovarian granulosa cell tumor - trisomy 12, FISH of ovarian granuloma cell tumor: trisomy 12, monosomy 17

Pleomorphic adenoma of salivary gland - t(3;8)(p21;q12), fusion of CTNNB1 and PLAG1 genes - karyotype, FISH and CISH

 

Other:

Tetraploidy in neonate who died shortly after death - FISH and karyotype

Presence of female cells in penile swabs after recent vaginal intercourse - image (Archives 2000;124:1080)

 

End of Molecular Pathology chapter