- ASAP represents our inability to render an incontrovertible diagnosis of cancer within a focus of concern that invariably has fewer than 2 dozen acini - less than the size of the head of a pin (Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1489)
- Most ASAP foci have ≤ 5 acini (see Fig. 1 in Micro images below)
- Some ASAP foci have > 5 acini, yet the cytologic features of nuclear enlagement, prominent nucleoli, and basal cell absence are all equivocal, preventing a definite cancer diagnosis (see Fig. 2)
- The histologic features that most often preclude a definitive diagnosis of malignancy are the small size of the focus (70% of cases), disappearance on step levels (61%), lack of significant cytologic atypia such as nucleolomegaly (55%), and associated inflammation (9%), raising the possibility of one of many mimics of adenocarcinoma (Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1489)
- A subset of ASAP diagnoses occur in conjunction with adjacent high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) (Hum Pathol 2001;32:389)
- This raises the special problem of an inability to separate tangential cutting of medium-sized pre-existing outpouchings of HGPIN from the usually smaller discrete acini of cancer (see Fig. 3)
- In such cases, we prefer the term ASAP + HGPIN to avoid over-diagnosis of tangentially-cut outpouchings of HGPIN as cancer
- ASAP is placed first owing to its stronger predictive value for subsequent cancer
- ASAP synonyms include Focal Glandular Atypia (FGA) and Atypical glands suspicious for cancer
- In the line diagnosis, "Atypical small acinar proliferation" is incomplete without adding the words, "suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy"
- In order to diagnose ASAP, ask yourself:
- "Would you remain absolutely confident of this biopsy diagnosis if it were followed by a negative radical prostatectomy?"
- "Are you certain there would be diagnostic agreement for cancer if your work got audited by another pathologist?"
- "Can the findings in this one core alone support an overall confident diagnosis of cancer for the case?"
- If these questions cannot be answered in the affirmative, ASAP is the suitable diagnosis
- Taking all studies into account, 34% to 60% of repeat biopsies showed cancer following the diagnosis of ASAP, but the vast majority place the predictive value for cancer in the 40%-50% range (Pathol Case Rev 2014;19:147)
- ASAP is never an indication for radical prostatectomy or definitive therapy
- Repeat biopsy is strongly recommended
- One recommendation (regardless of serum PSA) is to sample 3 cores from the site of the initial atypical sextant site, 2 cores from the adjacent atypical sextant sites; and 1 core from other sextant sites (Mod Pathol 2004;17:307)
- The predictive value of ASAP + HGPIN is about the same as for ASAP alone
- The histologic features that most often preclude a definitive diagnosis of malignancy are the small size of the focus (70% of cases), disappearance on step levels (61%), lack of significant cytologic atypia such as nucleolomegaly (55%), and associated inflammation-either acute or chronic (9%), raising the possibility of one of many mimics of adenocarcinoma such as atrophy or reactive acini (Am J Surg Pathol 1997;21:1489)
Small focus of 3-5 glands
Higher mag of glands
Insufficient cytologic support
Small focus of atypical glands
Images courtesy of Dr. Kenneth Iczkowski:
Definite nuclear atypia (Fig.1)
Mild nuclear atypia (Fig.2)
Outpouchings of PIN, or invasive cancer (Fig.3)
Racemase (pink) reactivity not increased (Fig.4)
Ambiguity in interpretation of stain (Fig.5)
- P504S (alpha-methylacyl CoA racemase) often positive but reactivity may be weaker than expected for cancer, causing hesitation in diagnosing cancer
- Prostatic basal cell stains (cytokeratin 34βE12-cytoplasmic and p63-nuclear) often negative or retain a stray basal cell, again causing hesitation in diagnosing cancer (see Fig. 5)
- Staining for these 3 antigens separately or simultaneously using two different colored chromogens can, under ideal conditions, resolve up to 76% of ASAPs per consensus of 3 urologic pathologists studied (Histopathology 2004;45:218)
- However, quite often immunostains cannot resolve a diagnostic dilemma but will support or reinforce a diagnosis of ASAP
End of Prostate > Prostatic carcinoma > Atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP), suspicious for but not diagnostic of malignancy
This information is intended for physicians and related personnel, who understand that medical information is often imperfect, and must be interpreted in the context of a patient's clinical data using reasonable medical judgment. This website should not be used as a substitute for the advice of a licensed physician.
All information on this website is protected by copyright of PathologyOutlines.com, Inc. Information from third parties may also be protected by copyright. Please contact us at [email protected]
with any questions (click here for other