
Home Chapter Home Jobs Conferences Fellowships Books
Advertisement
Ureters
Author: Nat Pernick, M.D. (see Authors page)
Revised: 20 April 2011
Copyright: (c) 2002-2011, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.
Table of contents
WHO/ISUP classification: general, hyperplasia, flat lesions with atypia, dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, papillary urothelial neoplasms-not carcinoma
Malignant tumors: urothelial carcinoma, metastases, staging
American Journal of Clinical Pathology (AJCP), Jan 1975 to Feb 2003 (no photos)
American Journal of Surgical Pathology (AJSP), Mar 1977 to Mar 2003
Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Archives), Oct 1975 to Jan 2003
Human Pathology (Hum Path), Mar 1970 to Feb 2003
Modern Pathology (Mod Path), Jan 1988 to Feb 2003
Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease (6th Ed)
Rosai, J: Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology (8th Ed); Mosby-Year Book, Inc., 1996
Free on-line tutorial on WHO/ISUP (numerous high quality images)
Please refer to these primary references for more detailed discussions and photographs
30 cm long, 5 mm in diameter
Ureteral narrowings are at ureteropelvic junction, crossing of external/common iliac artery and where ureters enter bladder; these are also sites of obstruction and stone impaction
Ureters enter bladder in oblique manner; bladder muscle contraction mechanically closes off ureteral orifice; defects cause reflux
Diverticuli: cause urinary tract infections
Double/bifid ureters: associated with duplication of renal pelves
Hydroureter: may have neurogenic cause
Megaloureter: may have smooth muscle defect
Ureteropelvic obstruction:
Causes hydronephrosis
More common in males and on left side, 20% bilateral
May be associated with agenesis of contralateral kidney
May be due to abnormal organization of smooth muscle bundles
Associated with long-standing chronic inflammation
Ureteritis cystica: fine cysts in mucosa composed of dilated Brunn’s nests with clear contents
Ureteral follicularis: fine granular mucosa due to multiple lymphoid follicles
Ureteritis glandularis: intestinal metaplasia in ureters
Granuloma inguinale: case report of extragenital granuloma inguinale presenting as a retroperitoneal mass resembling a soft tissue neoplasm and involving the ureter, Hum Path 1990;21:559
Rare, associated with stones
Micro: tiny mucin-containing microcysts and medium sized tubular structures resembling renal tubules and lined by cuboidal cells; cytologic atypia characterized by enlarged vesicular nuclei and prominent nucleoli; no mitotic figures; may have transmural involvement and appear infiltrative, Mod Path 2002;15:765, AJCP 1983;80:92
Micro images: image1, image2, image3, image4, image5, cytokeratin
Positive stains: CK7, AE1-AE3, mucin
Negative stains: CEA, p53, Ki-67 (<5%)
EM: epithelial cells with sparse microvilli and thick basal lamina
Stones (<= 5 mm), usually lodge at ureteropelvic junction, where ureters cross iliac artery, where ureters enter bladder
Strictures (congenital or due to sclerosing retroperitoneal fibrosis)
Tumors, blood clots, neurogenic causes
Pregnancy, local inflammation, endometriosis, local tumors (ureteral obstruction is a major cause of death from cervical carcinoma)
Adults 40+
70% idiopathic; others associated with ergot derivatives, beta blockers, adjacent inflammation, local tumors
Associated with mediastinal fibrosis, sclerosing cholangitis, Riedel thyroiditis
May have autoimmune origin
Micro: lymphocytes, plasma cells, eosinophils; variable granulomatous inflammation
Ureteroileal anastomotic sites for ileal conduits in childhood show various chronic changes; microscopically show cystically dilated intestinal glands, urothelial lined cysts, mucus pools and intestinal epithelial lined cysts, Hum Path 1993,24:189
Note: similar information is in bladder chapter/outline
Ash (1940) – classify as transitional cell carcinoma grades 1-4; grade 1 comparable to papilloma, grade 2 comparable to low grade; grades 3 (most) and 4 comparable to high grade
Mostofi (1960) – grade 1 called papilloma and not carcinoma
WHO/ISUP: World Health Organization / International Society of Urologic Pathologists consensus classification that is controversial for some lesions (low malignant potential)
Major changes from prior systems are that papillary urothelial carcinomas must exhibit atypia and carcinoma in situ need not be full thickness
WHO/ISUP grade correlates with tumor stage and recurrence
Website tutorial (click here), has further discussion; free but requires registration,
Classification:
Normal: flat mucosa with no overt thickness; includes slight disorganization of cells and nuclear pleomorphism, formerly termed mild dysplasia; size of normal urothelial cells is 3x lymphocytes, image1
Hyperplasia: flat or papillary
Flat lesions with atypia: reactive, unknown significance, dysplasia (LG IUN), CIS (HG IUN)
Papillary urothelial neoplasms: papilloma, inverted papilloma, low malignant potential, low grade, high grade
Invasive urothelial neoplasms: lamina propria invasion, muscularis propria invasion (for bladder)
Includes papilloma, inverted papilloma, low malignant potential, low grade papillary urothelial neoplasms,
urothelial carcinoma grade 1 of 3, some urothelial carcinomas grade 2 of 3
Markedly thickened mucosa without cytologic atypia, image1
May be adjacent to low grade papillary urothelial neoplasm
By itself has no malignant potential and requires no treatment
Slight tenting, undulating or papillary growth lined by urothelium of varying thickness, without atypia
Asymptomatic, found on routine follow-up cystoscopy of papillary urothelial neoplasms
Often has small dilated capillaries at base, but no well defined fibrovascular core; lacks discrete papillary fronds associated with papillary neoplasm, image1
Treatment: follow up if new, unknown if increased risk of papillary neoplasm in patient with prior history of papillary urothelial tumor
Architectural pattern of papillary hyperplasia with atypia of overlying urothelium
80% male, age range 55 to 92 years
At diagnosis, 50% associated with flat carcinoma in situ, 30% with dysplasia
Prognostic implications: usually associated with high grade papillary urothelial carcinoma; also CIS and invasive urothelial carcinoma, Hum Path 2002;33:512
Reactive: inflammatory atypia; uniformly enlarged and vesicular nuclei, central prominent nucleoli, may have frequent mitotic figures; may have history of instrumentation, stones or therapy; not neoplastic, image1
Flat lesions of unknown significance: between reactive atypia and dysplasia, more pleomorphism and hyperchromasia than expected for the amount of inflammation present; should have close follow up and reevaluation after inflammation subsides, image1
Aka low grade intraurothelial neoplasia (LG IUN)
Low interobserver agreement on diagnosis, even among experts
Micro: appreciable cytologic and architectural changes indicative of neoplasia, but less than CIS, image1
Aka high grade intraurothelial neoplasia (HG IUN)
Usually flat lesion, not papillary
Precursor of invasive cancer in some cases
May shed atypical cells into urine, making cytology valuable for diagnosis
Micro: flat lesion composed of cells with large, irregular, hyperchromatic nuclei, mitotic figures in mid to upper epithelium; atypia may not be full thickness
In bladder, nuclear area 5x lymphocytes vs. 2x lymphocytes for normal urothelium, Hum Path 2001;32:997
Also (but less important) loss of polarity, nuclear crowding, irregular thickness of urothelium
Note: high grade non-invasive papillary lesions are NOT designated carcinoma in situ to avoid confusion
Micro images: image1
Patterns: large cells with, or large cells without pleomorphism, small cell, clinging (single layer of atypical cells on denuded urothelium), cancerization of urothelium (pagetoid, undermining or overriding); pattern need not be included in surgical pathology report
Associated microinvasion (2 mm or less) demonstrates invasive cells with retraction artifact mimicking vascular invasion (77% of cases of microinvasion); also nests or irregular cords, rarely as isolated single cells with or without desmoplasia, AJSP 2001;25:356
Positive stains: typical pattern is CK20+, p53+, CD44-; E-cadherin positive (Hum Path 2002;33:996)
DD: denuding cystitis (cells may look malignant), reactive atypia (patchy CK20 in umbrella cells only, p53 weak/negative, CD44 diffusely or focally positive vs. CIS with intense CK20 and p53 positivity in 81% and 57% of cases, CD44 negative in all cases, AJSP 2001;25:1074)
Papilloma
Rare, benign, usually small and isolated in younger patients
May recur
Gross: soft, pink, delicate papillary structures, usually pedunculated
Micro: distinct papillary growth, small delicate stalk with central fibrovascular core lined by urothelium of normal thickness and cytology; no fusion of adjacent fronds; papillary fronds may appear detached due to sectioning of complex arborizing papillary structures; necrosis rare; minimal mitosis
Reference: Mod Path 2000;13:1315
Inverted urothelial papilloma
Adult and elderly men
Low risk of recurrence if completely excised
May be associated with urothelial carcinoma, rarely in the inverted urothelial papilloma itself
Gross: usually solitary, polypoid, pedunculated; at trigone, bladder neck or prostatic urethra
Micro: invagination of epithelium, no atypia, no papillae, minimal stroma
Epithelium may be insular, trabecular, pallisading, gland-like resembling cystitis glandularis; rarely neuroendocrine
DD: urothelial carcinoma invading into Brunn nests
May arise in young patients
1/3 recur, 5% as higher grade; 10 year survival 95% or more
Are rarely associated with invasion or metastases
Some question distinguishing these lesions from low grade papillary urothelial carcinomas
Add to report "Patients with these tumors are at risk of developing new bladder tumors ("recurrence"), usually of a similar histology. However, since these subsequent lesions occasionally manifest as urothelial carcinoma, follow up is warranted."
Have lower MIB-1, p53, mitotic counts than low grade papillary carcinomas, and higher disease free survival (76 vs. 15 months), AJSP 2001;25:1528
Micro: orderly arrangement of cells within papillae with minimal architectural abnormalities and minimal nuclear atypia, regardless of cell thickness; thicker epithelium than papilloma, increase in nuclear size and hyperchromasia compared to papilloma; mitotic figures if present are usually confined to basal layer
Micro images: image #1; A and B; #2
Reference: Mod Path 2001;14:267, Mod Path 2000;13:1315
Usually mesenchymal, such as leiomyoma or fibroepithelial polyp
Fibroepithelial polyps protrude into lumen, also seen in bladder, renal pelves, urethra; composed of loose vascularized connective tissue beneath mucosa
May be affected by neurofibromatosis, AJSP 1989;13:873
Case reports: 43 year old man with flank pain and gross hematuria (Case of the Week #203)
Mean age 52 years, range 15 to 94 years (entire urinary tract), M/F = 2:1
Ureter rare site (4% of all urinary tract tumors)
Micro: usually tubular or cystic pattern;
also papillary; composed of small, hollow, round tubules; some solid,
occasionally elongated; may have pseudoinfiltrative appearances; basement
membrane around tubules may be appreciable but not prominent; tubules/cysts
often have eosinophilic or basophilic secretion
Reference: Mod
Path 1995;8:722
Urothelial carcinoma of renal pelvis and ureter often lumped together as “upper urinary tract”
Most malignancies of ureter are urothelial carcinomas
Most patients are women, age 50+, non-white
Cause obstruction, may be multiple, occur concurrently in lower urinary tract
Associated with smoking, occupational exposure to arylamines, analgesic nephropathy, Balkan nephropathy
Also associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), characterized by mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, detectable by microsatellite instability; associated with family history of colon cancer and higher grade urothelial carcinomas, Mod Path 2002;15:790
Case reports: micropapillary urothelial carcinoma (Archives 2000;124:1347), HNPCC (Archives 2003;127:E60)
Overall 5 year survival (including renal pelvis) is 75%
Tumor grade and stage are most important predictors of prognosis
Low grade, noninvasive papillary urothelial carcinomas are monoclonal - multiple synchronous tumors appear to be due to intramucosal seeding, Hum Path 1999;30:1197
Treatment: nephroureterectomy with excision of ipsilateral ureteral orifice and bladder cuff en bloc
Micro images: figure 1C/1D, image1, image2,
Positive stains: thrombomodulin (AJCP 1998;110:385)
Molecular image: microsatellite instability
Common site for ovarian cancer metastases (24% of patients) at autopsy, Hum Path 1988;19:57
Primary Tumor (T)
TX: Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0: No evidence of primary tumor
Ta: Papillary noninvasive carcinoma
Tis: Carcinoma in situ
T1: Tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue
T2: Tumor invades the muscularis
T3: Tumor invades beyond muscularis into periureteric fat
T4: Tumor invades adjacent organs, or through the kidney into the perinephric fat
Note: laterality does not affect the N classification
NX: Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed
N0: No regional lymph node metastasis
N1: Metastasis in a single lymph node, 2 cm or less in greatest dimension
N2: Metastasis in a single lymph node, more than 2 cm but not more than 5 cm in greatest dimension; or multiple lymph nodes, none more than 5 cm in greatest dimension
N3: Metastasis in a lymph node, more than 5 cm in greatest dimension
M0: No distant metastasis
M1: Distant metastasis
Anatomic stage / prognostic groups
Stage 0a: Ta N0 M0
Stage 0is: Tis N0 M0
Stage I: T1 N0 M0
Stage II: T2 N0 M0
Stage III: T3 N0 M0
Stage IV: T4 N0 M0 or Any T N1-3 M0 or M1
End of Ureters chapter