Page views in 2024 to date: 28
18 March 2021 - Case of the Month #501

All cases are archived on our website. To view them sorted by case number, diagnosis or category, visit our main Case of the Month page. To subscribe or unsubscribe to Case of the Month or our other email lists, click here.

Thanks to Dr. Constantina Petraki, Metropolitan Hospital, Athens (Greece) and the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) for contributing this case and discussion and to Dr. Nicole Andeen, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon (USA), for reviewing the discussion.




Advertisement


Website news:

(1) Dr. Kelly Magliocca has been appointed as Deputy Editor, Head & Neck Pathology. She will oversee this subspecialty in our textbook and supervise the assigning and editing of these topics. Dr. Kiran Motaparthi has been appointed to the Editorial Board for Dermatopathology. He is the Associate Professor, Residency Program Director and Director of Dermatopathology in the Department of Dermatology at the University of Florida College of Medicine in Gainesville.

(2) Our next What’s New in Pathology newsletter on Gynecologic Pathology by Editorial Board members Drs. Carlos Parra-Herran and Jennifer Bennett has been released. Going forward, these newsletters will also be published by the Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine and will be DOI indexed and citable. They will be available on PubMed & PubMed Central. Thank you to Dr. Andrey Bychkov on our Editorial Board for making this happen.

(3) Dr. Pernick has proposed The American Code Against Cancer, resembling the European Code, listing behavioral changes to help reduce annual U.S. cancer deaths from 600,000 to 100,000. Email your comments to Nat@PathologyOutlines.com.

Visit and follow our Blog to see recent updates to the website.



Case of the Month #501

Clinical history:
A woman in her 50s underwent nephrectomy for an incidentally identified 5.1 cm renal mass.

Histopathology images:


What is your diagnosis?

Click here for diagnosis, test question and discussion:



Diagnosis: Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma of the kidney

Test question (answer at the end):
If necessary, one reliable feature to distinguish mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma in a challenging case is

A. Clinical and radiographic evaluation
B. Genomic evaluation
C. Immunohistochemistry
D. Morphologic features of papillary growth and foam cells


Stains:

CD10




Discussion:
The tumor was circumscribed, tan-brown / yellow. Microscopic examination revealed a pT1b biphasic tumor with tubular and spindle cell morphology and focally mucinous stroma and foamy cells. The tumor cells were positive for PAX8, PAX2, AMACR and CK8/18. CK7, KSP-Cadherin, CAIX, CD15 and vimentin were focally positive. CD10 was mainly negative (shown). CD117, ALK1, CKHMW, CK20 and cathepsin K were negative. SDHB and fumarate hydratase were retained. The Ki67 / MIB1 index was low (≤ 5%).

Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma is a rare renal epithelial neoplasm characterized by tubular formations merging with bland spindle cells and a variably myxoid stroma. The nuclei have low grade features. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells are generally positive for CK7, PAX8, PAX2 and AMACR and mostly negative for CD10. Most tumors have indolent behavior and recurrence is rare. Tumors with high grade transformation and metastases have been reported.

The differential diagnosis includes papillary renal cell carcinoma with solid growth pattern and papillary renal cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid transformation. The latter has high nuclear atypia in the stroma and is generally CD10 positive. The molecular genomic signature is useful - in mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma, it is hypodiploid with multiple chromosomal losses (-1, -4, -6, -8, -9, -13, -14, -15, -22), some hypertriploid but no identifiable pattern, in contrast to the distinct signature of +7, +17 and loss of chromosome Y in papillary renal cell carcinoma.

References:
Clin Genitourin Cancer 2019;17:268, Indian J Cancer 2020;57:267

Test question answer:
B.
Genomic evaluation. The papillary genomic signature of +7, +17 and loss of chromosome Y is not shared with mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma.

Image 01 Image 02