Breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Editorial Board Member: Kristen E. Muller, D.O.
Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Gary Tozbikian, M.D.
Joshua J.X. Li, M.B.Ch.B.

Last staff update: 29 March 2023 (update in progress)

Copyright: 2001-2023,, Inc.

PubMed Search: Breast neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Joshua J.X. Li, M.B.Ch.B.
Page views in 2022: 7,482
Page views in 2023 to date: 2,668
Cite this page: Li JJX, Tse GM. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. website. Accessed April 2nd, 2023.
Definition / general
  • Chemotherapy preceding surgical resection to downstage disease
  • Associated with characteristic histological features on the resection specimen, with prognostic implications
Essential features
  • The treatment effects associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be seen in the primary tumor (tumor bed), axillary nodal metastases and normal breast tissue
  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves survival and functional outcome by allowing resection in initially nonresectable disease or by reducing the extent of surgical resection
  • Degree of response (extent of residual disease) is predictive of outcome, in particular, a complete pathologic response without residual tumor detected is indicative of good prognosis (Mod Pathol 2015;28:1185)
Clinical features
  • Indications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy include:
    • Locally advanced disease, to allow resection of unresectable disease
    • Disease where breast conservation is not possible but potentially feasible if downstaging is achieved
    • Temporary / treatable conditions that contraindicate surgery and thus require bridging therapy (Curr Oncol 2021;28:1338)
    • Clinically, node positive disease with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and negative sentinel lymph nodes may be spared from axillary dissection (Br J Surg 2021;108:748)
  • Clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is classified as:
    • Clinical complete response: complete disappearance of tumor
    • Clinical partial response: ≥ 50% reduction greatest dimension of tumor
    • Clinically positive nodes may also respond (reduce in size) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • Clinical assessment may overestimate tumor size due to posttreatment fibrosis (Radiology 2017;285:358)
  • Clinical response is predictive of outcome and correlates with pathological response (J Surg Oncol 2002;80:4, Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2010;39:734)
Radiology description
  • Conventional imaging modalities for assessment of radiological response includes mammography, ultrasound, MRI
  • Functional imaging is also used for assessment of radiological response
    • Response is defined by normalization of tracer uptake (complete response) or by change in tracer uptake (Radiology 2017;285:358)
    • MRI is more accurate in predicting complete pathological response than PET / CT (Oncologist 2016;21:931)
Radiology images

Contributed by Joshua J.X. Li, M.B.Ch.B. and Gary M. Tse, M.B.B.S.
Pretreatment MRI

Pretreatment MRI

Posttreatment MRI

Posttreatment MRI

Prognostic factors
  • Complete pathologic response demonstrates good prognostic prediction in certain types of breast cancers but not all (J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1796)
    • Strong positive correlation with survival in HER2 positive, triple negative and luminal B / HER2 negative (ER / PR positive, HER2 negative, grade 3) breast cancers
    • Poor correlation with survival in luminal A (ER / PR positive, HER2 negative) and luminal B / HER2 positive (ER / PR positive, HER2 positive) breast cancers
  • Multiple systems for reporting and evaluating response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been described (Drug Des Devel Ther 2020;14:2423)
Gross description
  • Gross appearance of tumor may indicate degree of pathological response
    • Tumors with poor response demonstrate a firm, gritty and spiculated appearance (i.e., no difference from typical untreated tumors)
    • Response can be indicated by fibrosis or softening of the tumor bed (Mod Pathol 2015;28:1185)
    • Tumors with partial response can be nodular, multifocal with and less well defined borders (Breast 2022;62:S25)
    • In cases of complete response, the tumor bed may be soft and indistinguishable from normal breast tissue
  • Tumor mapping with radiographs, photographs or drawings of the sectioned gross specimen is recommended (Mod Pathol 2015;28:1185)
  • Considerations in tumor sampling
    • Sampling should include all grossly residual disease, visible tumor bed, marker clips and adjacent tissue
    • Recommendations on sampling extent are based on pretreatment size
      • 1 block per cm (Food and Drug Administration)
      • 5 blocks of a cross section per 1 - 2 cm, up to 25 blocks for very large tumors (Breast International Group and the North American Breast Cancer Group)
    • In cases where the tumor bed cannot be identified, correlation with preoperative clinical and radiological findings is recommended for determining the location of sampling
Gross images

Contributed by Emily S. Reisenbichler, M.D.

Complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

No significant response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Microscopic (histologic) description
  • Breast
    • Multiple reporting systems are described but generally response is classified into:
      • Complete pathologic response: no residual tumor cells
        • Residual tumor within lymphovascular spaces (lymphovascular invasion) is not allowed for complete pathologic response
        • There is debate on whether ductal carcinoma in situ should be considered as residual disease, residual in situ disease demonstrates association with shorter disease free survival but not overall survival (Mod Pathol 2015;28:1185, J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1796)
      • Incomplete response / residual disease: evidence of tumor response but residual tumor cells are present
        • Cutoffs for categories vary for different systems
      • No response: treatment associated changes are not seen histologically
    • Histologic evidence of tumor response includes fibrosis, hyalinization, lymphohistiocytic infiltration, hemosiderin laden macrophages, giant cell formation and vascular proliferation
    • Patterns observed in partial response includes concentric tumor shrinkage, reduction in tumor cellularity and scattered multifocal tumor deposits (Mod Pathol 2015;28:1185)
    • Tumor cells show degenerative changes including nuclear and cytoplasmic vacuolation, karyorrhexis, karyolysis and pyknosis (Int J Appl Basic Med Res 2012;2:111)
      • There may be a change in histologic grading after neoadjuvant therapy
    • Normal breast tissue shows ductal and lobular atrophy, atypia and hyalinization of vessel wall
  • Lymph node
    • Possible scenarios include:
      • Presence of tumor cells, with no evidence of histologic treatment response
      • Presence of tumor cells, histologic evidence of treatment response seen
      • Absence of tumor cells, histological evidence of treatment response seen
      • Absence of tumor cells and histologic evidence of treatment (true negative nodes)
    • Histological evidence of tumor response in the lymph node includes fibrosis, mucin pools and histiocytic infiltrates
    • Presence of tumor response indicates possible previous nodal involvement and is associated with prognosis intermediate between node negative and node positive patients (Ann Surg Oncol 2003;10:734)
    • Residual nodal disease is associated with shorter disease free and overall survival (J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1796)
Microscopic (histologic) images

Contributed by Joshua J.X. Li, M.B.Ch.B., Gary M. Tse, M.B.B.S. and Emily S. Reisenbichler, M.D.
Tumor with treatment effect Tumor with treatment effect Tumor with treatment effect

Tumor with treatment effect

Fibrotic tumor bed

Fibrotic tumor bed

Minimal residual disease

Minimal residual disease

Complete pathologic response

Complete pathologic response

Posttreatment lymph node

Posttreatment lymph node

No residual invasive or in situ tumor

Small clusters of residual invasive tumor cells

Virtual slides

Images hosted on other servers:

Tumor with incomplete response

Near complete response with isolated residual tumor focus

Sample pathology report
  • Left breast, local excision:
    • No residual tumor (complete pathologic response) (see comment)
    • Comment: Sections of the tumor bed shows fibrosis and atrophic changes, with lymphohistiocytic infiltrates and hemosiderin deposition. No viable tumor cells are seen. The remaining breast tissue is unremarkable.

  • Left breast, local excision:
    • Partial / no response (see comment)
    • Comment: Sections show residual invasive carcinoma of ______ (histotype) and _______ (grade). Fibrosis, lymphohistiocytic infiltrates and hemosiderin deposition in keeping with treatment effects are / are not noted. The residual tumor cellularity is ______%. In situ carcinoma is / is not noted and comprises ______% of the residual tumor cellularity. Lymphovascular invasion is / is not identified. The tumor measures ______ mm and is clear from (specify if < 1 cm ____) / involves the resection margins.

  • Left axillary dissection:
    • __ out of ___ lymph nodes involved by metastatic carcinoma (see comment)
    • Comment: Sections show a total of ____ lymph nodes. ____ lymph nodes show metastatic carcinoma with ____ showing fibrosis, mucin pools and histiocytic infiltrates, suggestive of treatment response. Extracapsular spread is / is not seen. Similar features are seen / not seen in ___ of the remaining benign lymph nodes.
Board review style question #1

Which of the following cases is considered a complete pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

  1. Absence of tumor cells in the tumor bed but isolated tumor cells present in an axillary lymph node
  2. Absence of tumor cells in the tumor bed but with viable tumor cells present in lymphovascular spaces of quadrant samplings
  3. Fibrous tumor bed with adjacent lobules showing atypical epithelial lining cells
  4. Significant tumor necrosis in the tumor bed with rare viable tumor cells
  5. Small clusters of tumor cells constituting < 5% of cellularity among a fibrous tumor bed
Board review style answer #1
C. Fibrous tumor bed with adjacent lobules showing atypical epithelial lining cells. Complete pathologic response is defined as the absence of residual tumor cells. Presence of any viable tumor cells, regardless of cellularity, in the tumor bed, lymph nodes or lymphovascular spaces should not be considered as complete pathologic response. Chemotherapy can result in atypia in normal breast epithelium and should not be confused with residual disease.

Comment Here

Reference: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Board review style question #2
In which of the following scenarios is neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally considered?

  1. Patient with DCIS of the breast
  2. Patient with local invasive breast cancer and active hepatitis B infection
  3. Early stage, low grade, hormone positive / HER2 negative invasive breast cancer
  4. Patient with radiological evidence of bone metastasis with biopsy proven stage IV breast cancer
  5. Patient with suspected muscle invasive breast cancer
Board review style answer #2
E. Patient with suspected muscle invasive breast cancer. General contraindications to chemotherapy apply to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including active hepatitis. Patients with unresectable disease or bulky nodal disease are also not indicated for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The current role of adjuvant therapy in phyllodes tumor is unclear and is generally not offered (Histopathology 2016;68:5). T4 disease (muscle invasion) is not a contraindication to neoadjuvant therapy.

Comment Here

Reference: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02