Cytopathology
Palpation guided fine needle aspiration
Superficial FNA procedure: contraindications and complications

Editorial Board Members: Bonnie Choy, M.D., Ricardo R. Lastra, M.D.
Fnu Raja, M.B.B.S.
Santhi Ganesan, M.D.

Last author update: 9 January 2024
Last staff update: 9 January 2024

Copyright: 2002-2024, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

PubMed Search: Fine needle aspiration contraindications and complications

Fnu Raja, M.B.B.S.
Santhi Ganesan, M.D.
Page views in 2023: 2,606
Page views in 2024 to date: 585
Cite this page: Raja F, Ganesan S. Superficial FNA procedure: contraindications and complications. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/cytopathologyfnacontraindications.html. Accessed April 20th, 2024.
Definition / general
  • Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive method for acquiring a cellular specimen involving the insertion of a fine needle into a mass, extracting cellular material and then providing a cytological diagnosis (StatPearls: Fine Needle Aspiration [Accessed 1 September 2023])
  • Superficial FNA procedure is a minimally invasive, safe, fast, and cost effective technique that enhances clinical decision making and appropriate patient triage by distinguishing an inflammatory process from a neoplastic lesion, broadly
  • Although not many major contraindications or complications are associated with superficial FNA procedures, it is important to address the few complications that are relevant to the clinical context
Essential features
  • FNA is a minimally invasive diagnostic method and complications are relatively rare when dealing with superficial lumps compared to deep seated lesions (StatPearls: Fine Needle Aspiration [Accessed 1 September 2023])
  • Patient consent and cooperation are necessary before starting the procedure
  • FNA cytology can be performed safely on most of the palpable superficial lumps and cysts
  • Knowledge of site specific FNA procedural complications helps with effective communication and establishing clinical rapport
  • Awareness of potential diagnostic limitations aids in minimizing false positive and false negative FNA cytology diagnosis and improving cytology histology correlation
  • Rapid on site sample adequacy evaluation (ROSE) or immediate cytologic assessment can increase adequacy rates and reduce needle passes (PLoS One 2015;10:e0135466)
  • FNA cytology diagnosis when performed in the outpatient clinics and inpatient units is time and cost effective and enhances patient triage (Diagn Cytopathol 2002;27:1)
Terminology
  • Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB)
  • Rapid on site sample adequacy evaluation (ROSE)
Sites
  • FNA can be performed on any palpable superficial lesions percutaneously by a pathologist or clinician; deep body site FNAs are performed under image guidance
  • Common superficial body sites
    • Head and neck including salivary gland masses or cysts
    • Cervical lymph nodes
    • Subcutaneous mass or cyst
    • Breast lesions of low clinical suspicion for breast cancer (e.g., cyst, abscess or other benign processes)
    • Suspected recurrent malignancy in the chest wall (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021;145:825)
    • Discrete thyroid nodules rarely
Contraindications
Limitations
  • Superficial FNA procedure is safe with relatively fewer major complications but there are a few limitations to this time and cost efficient procedure, which include the following
    • When there is a high degree of suspicion that cytology will not be sufficient to make the diagnosis and histology is needed (e.g., suspected lymphoma) (StatPearls: Fine Needle Aspiration [Accessed 1 September 2023])
    • Using breast FNA for primary diagnosis of breast lesions and prognostic / predictive biomarkers in breast carcinoma as it can be very challenging to interpret immunohistochemistry in breast pathology using FNA cell block material (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021;145:825)
    • Distinguishing between in situ and invasive breast carcinoma using breast FNA (Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25:73)
    • Patients with severe coagulopathic disorders due to relative bleeding risks, which should be addressed carefully during the preprocedural decision making process (Endosc Int Open 2019;7:E15)
    • Risk of false negative result due to sampling error especially in thyroid and breast lesions (Thyroid 2004;14:207)
    • Risk of false positive results due to diagnostic misinterpretation especially in breast lesions; breast fine needle aspiration cytology (Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:561)
    • Ethical dilemma regarding when to disclose the preliminary result to the patient as opposed to deferring the disclosure (AMA J Ethics 2016;18:779)
Complications of FNA on superficial masses
Organ specific complications
Parotid gland
  • Parotitis
  • Facial nerve paresis (Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:260)
  • Seeding of malignant cells
    • Very rare complication due to displacement of tumor cells immediately after FNAC or core needle biopsy
    • It is not clear if disseminated malignant cells mature into tumor masses (along the needle track or in subcutaneous fat away from the tumor)
    • Histological features (associated with an inflammatory and multinucleated foreign body type giant cell response) have been suggested as diagnostic of seeding along the needle track (Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:260)
    • Lack of specific criteria for this entity and a defined interval after which the tumor developed make this complication clinically less relevant

Breast
  • Bleeding
  • Bruising
  • Swelling at the aspirated site
  • Pain
  • Pneumothorax, in rare instances if the needle is advanced deep in the chest area, especially in patients with thin chest wall and chest wall deformities (Int Semin Surg Oncol 2005;2:14)
    • Pneumothorax is a relatively rare complication of breast FNA since the ribs form a much larger area of the chest wall surface than the intercostal muscles; furthermore, the pectoral muscles provide additional protective structures
    • Pneumothorax after breast FNA may be seen more frequently in patients who have thin body habitus and small sized breasts
    • Patients with deep central lesions or lesions in the tail of the breast are also at higher risk for developing this complication

Thyroid
  • Bleeding
  • Local pain at the aspirated site
  • Cervical neuritis preceded by post-FNA hematoma
  • Tumor seeding (Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;54:260)
  • Acute or delayed transient swelling of the thyroid gland
  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury
    • One of the infrequent complications
    • Incidence rate is still unknown
    • Multiple mechanisms have been proposed (nerve stretching by hematoma, inflammation, thrombosis in small arterioles and rarely direct injury to nerve) (Radiol Diagn Imaging 2017;1:1)
  • Thyrotoxicosis (Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;71:157)
  • Cutaneous sinus formation (Case Rep Endocrinol 2014;2014:923438)
  • Very rarely, pseudoaneurysm in superior thyroid artery (Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2009;71:157)
  • Very rarely, focal carotid intramural hematoma
  • Acute bacterial thyroiditis
    • Rare complication representing only 0.7% of all thyroid FNA related complications
    • Can result in serious consequences (systemic sepsis, endangering the airways, cardiac arrhythmias)
    • Common bacteria involved are Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus sp. (Case Rep Endocrinol 2020:2020:7104806)
Case reports
  • 35 year old woman presented with hoarseness, laryngeal stridor and dyspnea without fever that emerged ~3 days after a first diagnostic FNA (Int J Endocrinol Metab 2016;14:e39174)
  • 49 year old woman with background history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and presumed transient ischemic attack (TIA) presented with an anterior neck lump of 1 year duration (Case Rep Endocrinol 2020;2020:7104806)
  • 49 year old man presented with acute swelling and severe tenderness of the parotid gland accompanied by skin hyperemia, which had started 1 day after FNA (Eur J Case Rep Intern Med 2019;6:001147)
Board review style question #1
Which of the following is a contraindication for FNA?

  1. Palpable cervical lymph node
  2. Pulsatile neck lesions
  3. Salivary gland mass or cyst
  4. Superficial palpable skin and subcutaneous nodule
Board review style answer #1
B. Pulsatile neck lesions. Pulsatile neck lesions are associated with higher risk of bleeding due to their vascular nature. The other options are incorrect as they are not contraindications for FNA. Answer C is incorrect because FNA is a helpful tool for differentiating neoplastic and nonneoplastic conditions and diagnosing most benign salivary gland neoplasms. Answer A is incorrect because FNA of palpable cervical lymph node is useful in the diagnosis of metastatic carcinomas and granulomatous processes. Answer D is incorrect because FNA is a reliable and useful procedure for the diagnosis of superficial palpable skin and subcutaneous nodules. Complications are quite rare, especially when using the small needle.

Comment Here

Reference: Superficial FNA procedure: contraindications and complications
Board review style question #2
Which of the following statements regarding FNA is correct?

  1. Complications are lower with superficial masses when compared to the deep seated masses
  2. It cannot distinguish between in situ and invasive breast carcinoma
  3. It cannot distinguish between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions
  4. Patient understanding and consent are not necessary before the procedure
Board review style answer #2
A. Complications are lower with superficial masses when compared to deep seated masses. Answer A is correct because complications, such as spread of infection or seeding of neoplastic cells through other tissue layers, are lower when FNA is performed on superficial masses as compared to the deep seated masses. Answer B is incorrect because FNA cannot reliably distinguish in situ from invasive carcinoma, as invasive features require documentation of stromal invasion in tissue biopsy. Answer C is incorrect because the FNA technique is very helpful in distinguishing between neoplastic and nonneoplastic lesions. Answer D is incorrect becausepatient understanding and consent are absolute requirements before performing the FNA.

Comment Here

Reference: Superficial FNA procedure: contraindications and complications
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02