Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Terminology | Pathophysiology | Diagrams / tables | Clinical features | Clinical images | Interpretation | Uses by pathologists | Microscopic (histologic) images | Molecular / cytogenetics description | Molecular / cytogenetics images | Sample pathology report | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1 | Board review style question #2 | Board review style answer #2Cite this page: Siegmund S. STK11. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/molecularSTK11.html. Accessed January 17th, 2025.
Definition / general
- Serine / threonine kinase 11 (STK11) is a gene located on chromosome 19p13.3
- Tumor suppressor gene with somatic mutations commonly observed in lung adenocarcinoma and germline mutations associated with the autosomal dominant disorder Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (PJS)
Essential features
- STK11 is a tumor suppressor gene that activates adenosine monophosphate activated protein kinase (AMPK) and regulates downstream mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling
- Somatic biallelic inactivation of STK11 is observed in 10 - 30% of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs)
- STK11 mutant NSCLCs show lower PDL1 expression, worse response to PDL1 targeted immunotherapies and worse overall survival compared with STK11 wild type (WT) tumors
- Germline mutations are associated with the autosomal dominant disorder Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (mucocutaneous pigmentation, hamartomas of the gastrointestinal [GI] tract and tumor predisposition)
Terminology
- Also known as liver kinase beta 1 (LKB1)
Pathophysiology
- STK11 is a serine / threonine kinase that activates AMPK in the PI3K / mTOR signaling pathway and leads to inhibition of mTOR signaling (Cells 2021;10:3129)
- Regulates cell polarity via actin cytoskeleton, cell growth and proliferation during low energy states and activation of autophagy during nutrient deprivation, cell response to DNA damage
- Functions as a tumor suppressor in tumorigenesis, where biallelic inactivation of STK11 causes aberrant activation of mTOR
Diagrams / tables
Clinical features
- STK11 somatic mutations occur in ~15 - 35% of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs) and are enriched in KRAS mutant and KEAP1 mutant lung adenocarcinoma, often mutually exclusive with EGFR mutations (Nature 2008;455:1069)
- STK11 mutant NSCLCs show lower PDL1 expression and patients have worse response to PDL1 targeted immunotherapies (Cancer Discov 2018;8:822, BMC Cancer 2024;24:491)
- STK11 mutant NSCLCs have worse overall survival compared with STK11 wild type patients and worse response to radiotherapy (Clin Cancer Res 2021;27:1720)
- Decreased STK11 expression is significantly associated with larger tumor size, lymph node metastasis and higher pathological tumor stage (PLoS One 2016;11:e0152674)
- STK11 germline alterations associated with autosomal dominant Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
- Characterized by hamartomatous polyps of the GI tract (particularly the small intestines), mucocutaneous pigmentation and predisposition to benign and malignant tumors
- Mucocutaneous pigmentation includes bluish black macules and papules of the perioral region, lips, buccal mucosa, fingers and vaginal region (Cureus 2024;16:e58887)
- GI hamartomas are typically multiple and may present in childhood secondary to intussusception (J Clin Med 2021;10:473)
- GI polyps frequently involve small intestines but also the stomach and colon (Cureus 2024;16:e58887)
- Tumors involve pancreas, breast, uterus, cervix (cervical adenocarcinoma of gastric type), ovary (sex cord tumors with annular tubules [SCTAT], STK11 associated adnexal tumor), stomach, thyroid, testis (intratubular large cell hyalinizing Sertoli cell tumor) or colon (Nature 1998;391:184, Pediatr Dev Pathol 2023;26:486, Am J Surg Pathol 2021;45:1061, Virchows Arch 2024;484:723)
- Relative risk of developing cancer estimated between 6 - 9x compared with normal population, generally by 30s - 40s (Dig Liver Dis 2013;45:606)
- Characterized by hamartomatous polyps of the GI tract (particularly the small intestines), mucocutaneous pigmentation and predisposition to benign and malignant tumors
Clinical images
Interpretation
- STK11 inactivation is generally detected by molecular testing; immunohistochemistry has limited utility (Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2851, Curr Oncol 2022;30:333)
- Normal expression in cytoplasm, nucleus, mitochondria; any degree of expression qualifies as intact
- Loss of expression in cytoplasm, nucleus and mitochondria is considered pathogenic; limited correlation of immunohistochemistry and pathogenic inactivation (e.g., due to missense mutations that do not affect protein immunogenicity)
Uses by pathologists
- Immunohistochemistry not currently used in routine practice by pathologists
- Identification of hamartomatous polyps of GI tract or STK11 associated malignancy (e.g., STK11 adnexal tumor or intratubular large cell hyalinizing Sertoli cell tumor of testis) should prompt diagnostic comment about genetic counseling
- See Clinical features
Microscopic (histologic) images
Molecular / cytogenetics description
- Genomic findings: inactivation through intragenic deletions, truncating mutations (nonsense mutations, frameshift indels), splice site alterations, missense mutations that interrupt protein - protein interactions or impair kinase activity, or promoter hypermethylation (Oncogene 2007;26:7825, Oncogene 2011;30:3784)
- Somatic mutations in tumors may affect kinase domain, localization signals, sites of posttranslational modification or protein - protein interactions with binding partners (e.g., STRAD, MO25) (Cell Commun Signal 2024;22:310)
- Common somatic missense mutations are numerous due to tumor suppressor functionality but include p.G163D/R, p.E165Q/K, p.H174D/L/R/Y, p.P179L/Q/R, p.N181I/S/T/Y, p.D194Y/N/V/G, p.G196V/G/R, p.S216F, p.Q220P, p.P221L/S, p.E223K/V, p.W239C/S, p.G242V/R/W, p.G251V/C/R, p.R297M/S, p.W308L/C (Carcinogenesis 2021;42:1428)
- Biallelic inactivation due to second hit can occur through loss of heterozygosity, deletion, second mutation
- Somatic STK11 inactivation most frequently detected by comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), splice alterations via RNA sequencing, copy changes through CGP or multiplex ligation dependent probe amplification (MLPA) or mutational signature detection associated with STK11 inactivation (Nature 2014;511:543, Carcinogenesis 2021;42:1428, J Thorac Oncol 2016;11:838)
- Peutz-Jeghers syndrome associated mutations are primarily located in the kinase domain region, leading to dysfunction (Cell Commun Signal 2024;22:310)
- Dedicated germline genetic testing (e.g., blood) is recommended to confirm diagnosis; however, identification of identical STK11 alteration in multiple tumors from different sites may be used as confirmatory evidence (Fam Cancer 2024 Mar 16 [Epub ahead of print])
Molecular / cytogenetics images
Sample pathology report
- Broad ligament, biopsy:
- STK11 adnexal tumor (paraovarian) (see comment)
- Immunohistochemistry reveals the following staining profile in lesional cells: LKB1 / STK11 - lost (nuclear and cytoplasmic)
- Comment: The tumor lesional cells demonstrate aberrant loss of STK11 / LKB1 staining, while staining is retained in adjacent fibrovascular tissue. This finding and the clinical presentation are compatible with a diagnosis of STK11 adnexal tumor; molecular confirmation is recommended. Of note, ~50% of STK11 adnexal tumors can arise in the setting of germline STK11 variants (Peutz-Jegher syndrome) and genetic testing should be considered if clinically indicated.
Board review style question #1
STK11 is altered in 10 - 30% of lung cancers and associated with a worse prognosis. Which of the following is a common mechanism of STK11 alteration in lung cancer?
- Kinase domain activating mutation
- Kinase domain duplication
- Oncogenic fusion
- Truncating mutations
Board review style answer #1
D. Truncating mutations. STK11 is a tumor suppressor gene and biallelic inactivation has been reported in up to 30% of non-small cell lung cancers. Truncating mutations are a frequent cause of inactivation. Answers A, B and C are incorrect because the mutations described are activating and would not be associated with biallelic inactivation.
Comment Here
Reference: STK11
Comment Here
Reference: STK11
Board review style question #2
Following presentation for intussusception, a 9 year old boy undergoes a polypectomy showing multiple hamartomatous polyps (see image above). His history is otherwise notable for freckles noted around his mouth and lips, a family history of polyps in his older sister and ovarian cancer in his mother. In your pathology report, you recommend genetic counseling to test for mutations in which gene and its associated genetic presentation?
- MUTYH / Gardner syndrome
- PRKAR1A / juvenile polyposis syndrome
- PTEN / Cowden syndrome
- STK11 / Peutz-Jeghers syndrome
Board review style answer #2
D. STK11 / Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. The clinical features described (mucocutaneous pigmentation and small intestinal hamartomatous polyp in a child with family history of hamartomatous polyps and ovarian cancer) are a classic presentation of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, which is caused by autosomal dominant mutations in the gene STK11. Answer C is incorrect because mutations in PTEN are associated with hamartoma syndromes (e.g., Cowden) with skin manifestations but do not typically show mucocutaneous pigmentation and ovarian cancer. Answer B is incorrect because although PRKAR1A mutations are associated with cancer predisposition and cutaneous growth and pigmentation, the genetic association is with Carney complex and not juvenile polyposis syndrome. Answer A is incorrect because although both MUTYH gene mutations and Gardner syndrome are associated with cancer predisposition and polyposis, they do not represent a gene syndrome dyad.
Comment Here
Reference: STK11
Comment Here
Reference: STK11