Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Cell of origin | Epidemiology | Sites | Clinical and laboratory features | Diagnostic criteria (WHO 2017 classification) | Prognosis and predictive factors (2017 WHO classification) | Case reports | Microscopic (histologic) description | Microscopic (histologic) images | Peripheral smear images | Immunophenotype | Electron microscopy images | Molecular / cytogenetics description | Differential diagnosis | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1 | Board review style question #2 | Board review style answer #2Cite this page: Nguyen L, Zhang L. Chronic eosinophilic leukemia. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/myeloproliferativeCEL.html. Accessed June 4th, 2023.
Definition / general
- Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (NOS)
- Persistent increase in eosinophils in peripheral blood (≥ 1.5 x 109/L), bone marrow and tissue
- May be accompanied by increased blasts (< 20%) or clonal cytogenetic or molecular genetic abnormalities (Am J Hematol 2017;92:1243)
- Organ damage may occur as a result of infiltration and release of eosinophilic granules that contain cytokines and humoral factors
- Other clonal myeloid neoplasms and reactive eosinophilia should be excluded
- In the absence of blasts or evidence to prove clonality, a diagnosis of idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome should be made
Essential features
- Rare myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by a gradual increase in circulating eosinophils with cytologic atypia (rarely may be absent), left shifted granulocytic maturation and often hepatomegaly or splenomegaly
- Organ / tissue infiltration by eosinophils and eosinophilic microabcesses are frequently present, leading to tissue damage and organ dysfunction
- Clinical course is variable, transformation to acute myeloid leukemia is common and prognosis is generally poor
- Fatal cardiac damage has been documented secondary to the release of cytokines produced by eosinophils
- This diagnosis should be made after exclusion of reactive causes of eosinophilia, myeloid and lymphoid neoplasms associated with PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1 rearrangements and JAK2 fusion, and confirmation of clonality (Am J Hematol 2017;92:1243), see full WHO criteria below
Cell of origin
- Pluripotent hematopoietc stem cell, in some cases a pluripotent lymphoid-myeloid stem cell
Epidemiology
- Due to difficulty in distinguishing chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified from idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome, the true incidence is unknown
- Some reports show predilection for men in the seventh decade (Mod Pathol 2016;29:854, Am J Hematol 2012;87:643)
Sites
- Peripheral blood and bone marrow are always involved
- Splenic and hepatic involvement are also common
- Other frequent sites of involvement include the heart, lungs, central nervous system, skin and gastrointestinal tract
Clinical and laboratory features
- In some cases patients may be asymptomatic, longstanding eosinophilia without specific etiology (i.e. no allergy, asthma, drug reaction, parasitic infection or connective disease)
- Eosinophil count can vary from 1.5 - 400 x 109/L
- Can have leukocytosis (20 - 30 x 109/L), anemia, thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis
- Symptoms: weight loss, night sweats, fever (12%), fatigue (26%), myalgias or angioedema (14%), cough (12%), dyspnea (16%), pruritus and diarrhea
- Skin manifestations are the most common, followed by lung (44%) and GI tract (38%)
- Cardiovascular
- Endomyocardial fibrosis followed by restrictive cardiomegaly
- Hypertension, atherosclerosis and heart failure
- Scarring of mitral and tricuspid valves leading to regurgitation, thrombi formation and embolization in end organs
- Peripheral neuropathy, CNS dysfunction and rheumatologic findings (Am J Hematol 2012;87:643)
- Natural history varies considerably between individuals
Diagnostic criteria (WHO 2017 classification)
- Persistent eosinophilia (≥ 1.5 x 109/L) in which reactive causes have been excluded
- Does not meet diagnostic criteria for chronic myeloid leukemia with t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2) / BCR-ABL1 gene fusion, polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, primary myelofibrosis, chronic neutrophilic leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (BCR-ABL1 gene fusion negative) or systemic mastocytosis
- Blasts < 20% of peripheral blood and bone marrow cells and does not have the following cytogenetic aberrations:
- PDGFRA, PDGFRB or FGFR1 rearrangements
- t(8;9)(p22;p24.1) / PCM1-JAK2, t(9;12)(p24.1;p13.2) / ETV6-JAK2 or t(9;22)(p24.1;q11.2) / BCR-JAK2 fusions
- inv(16)(p13.1;q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) / CBFB / MYH11, t(15;17)(q22;q11-12) / PML-RARA or t(8;21)(q22;q22.1) / RUNX1 / RUNX1T1
- t(9;22)(q24;q31) / BCR-ABL1 fusions
- Presence of clonal cytogenetic or molecular genetic abnormality(ies)* or a blast count ≥ 2% in the peripheral blood or ≥ 5% in the bone marrow
- *Certain gene mutations (e.g. DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 with variant allele frequency ≥ 2%) can be seen in a subpopulation of elderly patients who do not have hematologic disorders, otherwise known as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential
- Diagnostic interpretation should be done with caution (N Engl J Med 2014;371:2477, Nat Med 2014;20:1472)
- *Certain gene mutations (e.g. DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1 with variant allele frequency ≥ 2%) can be seen in a subpopulation of elderly patients who do not have hematologic disorders, otherwise known as clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential
Prognosis and predictive factors (2017 WHO classification)
- Variable survival; median survival is 22.2 months
- Transformation to acute leukemia is common
- Response to imatinib therapy is uncommon (Am J Hematol 2012;87:643)
- Interferon α treatment led to cytogenetic remission in 3 patients with translocations with a 5q31-33 breakpoint (Haematologica 1999;84:651, Br J Haematol 1996;92:176, Am J Hematol 1998;58:137)
- Four cases demonstrated a somatic activating KIT M541L mutation that was responsive to low dose imatinib therapy (Oncotarget 2014;5:4665)
- Unfavorable prognostic findings include marked splenomegaly, blasts in the peripheral blood or increased blasts in the bone marrow, cytogenetic abnormalities and dysplastic features (Medicine (Baltimore) 1975;54:1, Blood 1981;58:1021, Q J Med 1983;52:1, Blood 1994;83:2759)
Case reports
- 52 year old man with t(5;12)(q31;p13) / ETV6-ACSL6 gene fusion, a novel variant of myeloid proliferative neoplasm with eosinophilia (Hum Pathol (N Y) 2016;5:6)
- 68 year old woman with liver infiltration resembling Budd-Chiari syndrome (Rinsho Ketsueki 2007;48:505)
- 72 year old man with autoimmune hemolytic anemia and erythrophagocytosis by eosinophils (Am J Hematol 2006;81:458)
Microscopic (histologic) description
- Peripheral blood:
- Striking eosinophilia (≥ 1.5 x 109/L) mainly composed of mature eosinophils and occasional immature eosinophilic precursors
- Circulating blasts can be seen but comprise < 20%
- Spectrum of nonspecific eosinophil abnormalities: sparse granulation, cytoplasmic vacuolation, nuclear hyper / hyposegmentation or increased size
- Occasional cases show normal eosinophilic morphology and lack dysplasia; however, lack of dysplasia favors reactive eosinophilia (Mod Pathol 2016;29:854)
- Often accompanied by neutrophilia, some with mild monocytosis (> 1 x 109/L) and a few with mild basophilia
- Striking eosinophilia (≥ 1.5 x 109/L) mainly composed of mature eosinophils and occasional immature eosinophilic precursors
- Bone marrow:
- Hypercellular due to eosinophilic proliferation; however, maturation is orderly without disproportionate increase in myeloblasts
- Charcot-Leyden crystals often present
- Usually normal erythropoeisis and megakaryocytopoiesis, however, abnormal megakaryocytes are occasionally seen
- Subpopulation of patients (27%) show morphologic features resembling BCR-ABL1 negative gerative neoplasms, myelodysplastic syndromes or myelodysplastic / myeloproliferative neoplasms (Mod Pathol 2016;29:854, Haematologica 2017;102:1352)
- Increased myeloblasts (commonly 5 - 19% in bone marrow)
- 1/3 of cases show myelofibrosis; severe fibrosis is rare
- Tissue:
- Eosinophilic infiltration or microabcesses
- Charcot-Leyden crystals
- Fibrosis (caused by the degranulation and release of eosinophilic basic and cationic proteins)
Microscopic (histologic) images
Peripheral smear images
Immunophenotype
- No specific immunophenotype has been associated with chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified; however, immunophenotyping is important to exclude T lymphocyte driven eosinophilia or acute leukemia
Molecular / cytogenetics description
- No specific cytogenetic or molecular genetic abnormality identified
- Must exclude neoplasms with rearrangements of BCR-ABL1, PDGFRA, PDGRB or FGFR1 or PCM1-JAK2, ETV6-JAK2 or BCR-JAK2 fusions
- Presence of recurrent translocations and karyotypic abnormalities that are seen in myeloid disorders [-8, -7, i(17q)] support the diagnosis (Br J Haematol 1996;95:2, Br J Haematol 1986;62:659)
- Common mutations in ASXL1, TET2 and EZH2; occasional JAK2 mutation (Blood 2005;106:2162, Mod Pathol 2016;29:854)
- Mutations in TET2, ASXL1 and DNMT3A can be detected in the elderly population without neoplasms (clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential) (N Engl J Med 2014;371:2477, Nat Med 2014;20:1472)
- Somatic activating KIT M541L mutation found in a few cases (Oncotarget 2014;5:4665)
- X linked polymorphism analysis of AR (HUMARA) and PGK genes in females proved clonality (Blood 1999;93:1651, Blood 1994;84:349)
Differential diagnosis
- Acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13.1;q22) or t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) / CBFB / MYH11 (2017 WHO classification)
- Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), BCR-ABL1 negative: besides features of myeloproliferative neoplasms and eosinophilia, dysplasia is present in > 10% of neutrophilic precursors but there is no monocytosis
- Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) with eosinophilia: sustained monocytosis ≥ 1 x 109/L for > 6 months with bone marrow morphologic findings compatible with CMML
- Idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) (2017 WHO classification):
- Diagnosis of exclusion given when:
- Eosinophil count ≥ 1.5 x 109/L for ≥ 6 months
- Exclude reactive causes of eosinophilia
- Exclude acute myeloid leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic syndromes, myelodysplastic / myeloproliferative neoplasms and systemic mastocytosis
- Exclude cytokine producing, immunophenotypically aberrant T cell population
- Tissue damage present due to hypereosinophilia
- Diagnosis of exclusion given when:
- Idiopathic hypereosinophilia: when criteria 1 - 4 listed above for idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome are met but there is no end organ damage
- Subset of patients harbor certain gene mutations, such as ASXL1 (43%), TET2 (36%), EZH2 (29%), SETBP1 (22%), CBL (14%) and NOTCH1 (14%) (Mod Pathol 2016;29:854)
- Presence of clonal genetic aberration favors chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified
- Lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome: abnormal cytokine release by immunophenotypically abnormal or clonal T cells
- Aberrant CD3- / CD4+ T cell population which can be detected by flow cytometry can be used to differentiate; absolute CD3- / CD4+ T cell count 0.01 - 28.3 k/L with median 0.35 k/L
- TCRγδ rearrangements were frequently identified (76%) (Medicine (Baltimore) 2014;93:255)
- Other phenotypic changes, e.g. CD3+ / CD4+ / CD7- and CD3+ / CD4- / CD8- TCRαβ+ have been reported (Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2007;27:389, N Engl J Med 1999;341:1112)
- Aberrant CD3- / CD4+ T cell population which can be detected by flow cytometry can be used to differentiate; absolute CD3- / CD4+ T cell count 0.01 - 28.3 k/L with median 0.35 k/L
- Medication related: administration of cytokines IL3, IL5 or GMCSF
- Myeloid neoplasms with rearrangement of PDGFRA, PDGFRB, FGFR1 or PCM1-JAK2, ETV6-JAK2 or BCR-JAK2 fusion (Blood 2017;129:704)
- Paraneoplastic eosinophilia: T cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, systemic mastocytosis, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, myeloproliferative neoplasms or certain solid tumors (e.g. lung cancer, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, etc.) associated with abnormal release of IL2, IL3, IL5 or GMCSF (Arch Pathol Lab Med 2013;137:259, Rinsho Ketsueki 1991;32:874, Acta Clin Belg 2011;66:293, Am J Hematol 2007;82:234, N Z Med J 1990;103:537)
- Reactive eosinophilia: parasitic or fungal infections, allergies, pulmonary disease (Löffler syndrome), cyclical eosinophilia, skin diseases (angiolymphoid hyperplasia), collagen vascular diseases such as Churg-Strauss syndrome and Kimura disease
- Systemic mastocytosis: clonal proliferation of atypical mast cells that meet 2017 WHO diagnostic criteria
- Eosinophils are present or increased, which could be a secondary reaction or derived from a neoplastic clone
Board review style question #1
Which of the following is useful in definitively diagnosing the lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome?
- Abnormal T cell population, e.g. CD3- / CD4+
- Elevated IL5 level
- Eosinophilia ≥ 1.5 k/L
- Eosinophilic tissue infiltrate
- Skin rush and pruritus
Board review style answer #1
A. Abnormal T cell population, e.g. CD3- / CD4+. Lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome is characterized by abnormal cytokine release by clonal T cells. CD3- / CD4+ T cells are often found in circulating blood but CD3+ / CD4+ / CD7- and CD3+ / CD4- / CD8- T cells have also been described. TCRγδ rearrangements are frequently identified in these patients; however, TCRαβ+ L-HES has also been reported. Elevated IL5 levels, eosinophilia and eosinophilic infiltration can be seen in a number of reactive, neoplastic and iatrogenic conditions and are not diagnostic or specific for L-HES. Pruritus and skin rash can occur as a result of eosinophilia but this finding is not specific.
Comment Here
Reference: Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS)
Comment Here
Reference: Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS)
Board review style question #2
Which of following morphologic or molecular genetic findings is frequently identified in chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified?
- Dysplastic noneosinophilic granulocytes
- ETV6-JAK2 fusion
- Hypercellular marrow with increased eosinophils
- KIT D816V gene mutation
- Marked monocytosis
Board review style answer #2
C. Hypercellular marrow along with eosinophilic proliferation, though nonspecific, is the most common feature for CEL-NOS.
Comment Here
Reference: Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS)
Comment Here
Reference: Chronic eosinophilic leukemia, not otherwise specified (CEL, NOS)