Stains & CD markers
EZH2
Copyright: 2019-2022, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.
PubMed Search: EZH2[TI] review[ptyp]
EZH2
Authors: Rong Xia, M.D., Ph.D., Raavi Gupta, M.D.
Editor-in-Chief: Debra L. Zynger, M.D.
Topic Completed: 25 July 2019
Minor changes: 25 June 2021
Copyright: 2019-2022, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.
PubMed Search: EZH2[TI] review[ptyp]
Table of Contents
Definition / general | Essential features | Terminology | Pathophysiology | Diagrams / tables | Interpretation | Uses by pathologists | Prognostic factors | Microscopic (histologic) description | Microscopic (histologic) images | Positive staining - normal | Positive staining - disease | Negative staining | Board review style question #1 | Board review style answer #1Cite this page: Xia R, Gupta R. EZH2. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/stainsEZH2.html. Accessed January 19th, 2022.
Definition / general
- A member of the polycomb group family (Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2613)
- Enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit (Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2613)
- Enzymatic subunit of the polycomb repressive complex 2, which methylates lysine 27 of histone H3 (Nat Med 2016;22:128)
Essential features
- Nuclear stain with strong and diffuse expression in rapidly proliferative tissues, such as testis and bone marrow, and scanty and weak expression in the basal layer of many normal epithelial lining in the gastrointestinal tract, bronchus, uterus, cervix, etc. (Nat Med 2016;22:128)
- Positive expression in many epithelial neoplasms (including prostate, bile duct, breast, melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, etc.) compared with their benign components (Eur J Dermatol 2014;24:41, Diagn Pathol 2012;7:86, Urol Oncol 2012;30:428)
- Increased expression correlates with worse prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, high grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, extranodal NK / T cell lymphoma, etc. (Pathol Res Pract 2019;215:152451, J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3706, Hum Pathol 2019;83:166, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018;144:2127, Urol Oncol 2018;36:343.e1, Eur J Dermatol 2014;24:41)
Terminology
- Enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit
Pathophysiology
- Catalyzes the trimethylation of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3), associated with transcriptional repression
- Further suppresses the activity of genes related to stem cell differentiation and ablates normal development (Nat Med 2016;22:128)
- Gain of function mutations or overexpression is associated with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, squamous cell carcinoma, malignant liver neoplasm and melanoma (Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:2613)
- Gain of function mutations or overexpression is associated with worse progression in prostate cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, endometrial cancer, myelodysplastic syndromes and melanoma (Nat Med 2016;22:128)
- Loss of function mutations is associated with a subset of myelodysplastic syndromes / myeloproliferative neoplasms and T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Nat Med 2016;22:128)
- Potential therapeutic target; 2 phase II trials of EZH2 inhibitors for treating lymphoma are underway (Nat Med 2016;22:128)
Diagrams / tables
Images hosted on other servers:
EZH2 as a repressor
Interpretation
- Nuclear staining
Uses by pathologists
- Differentiate malignant effusions (MOC31 membranous and EZH2 nuclear staining) from benign effusions (Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:118, Diagn Cytopathol 2014;42:111)
- Differentiate malignant mesothelioma (loss of BAP1 and high expression of EZH2) from benign mesothelial proliferation (Histopathology 2017;70:722)
- Differentiate squamous cell carcinoma (> 35% staining) from normal skin (< 5% stain) and actinic keratosis (< 15% staining) (Eur J Dermatol 2014;24:41)
- Differentiate cholangiocarcinoma (positive) from ductular reaction and bile duct adenoma (negative) (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:364)
- Differentiate invasive high grade urothelial carcinoma (high intensity and percentage in staining) of the bladder from noninvasive low grade urothelial carcinoma and carcinoma in situ (low intensity and percentage in staining) (Urol Oncol 2012;30:428)
- Differentiate malignant (positive) and benign (negative) hepatic tumors (Diagn Pathol 2012;7:86)
Prognostic factors
- High expression is an unfavorable prognostic marker in
- Cholangiocarcinoma (overexpression of EZH2 / SUZ12 / EED) (Pathol Res Pract 2019;215:152451)
- Renal cell carcinoma (J Clin Oncol 2017;35:3706)
- Extranodal NK / T cell lymphoma, nasal type (Hum Pathol 2019;83:166)
- Colorectal cancer (J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018;144:2127)
- High grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (Urol Oncol 2018;36:343.e1)
Microscopic (histologic) description
- Scattered nuclear staining in the basal layer of the benign epithelium in the gastrointestinal tract, bronchus, endometrium and skin
- Increased intensity of staining and number of positive cells in invasive squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma of the colorectum, urothelial carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, NK / T cell lymphoma and high grade neuroendocrine tumor
Microscopic (histologic) images
Contributed by Raavi Gupta, M.D.
Low grade neuroendocrine tumor
High grade neuroendocrine tumor
Normal skin
Squamous cell carcinoma in situ
Squamous cell carcinoma
Positive staining - normal
- Testis, placenta, bone marrow: diffuse and strong staining
- Skin: scattered and weak staining in the basal and spinous layer of the epidermis and strong intense stain in Langerhans cells (Eur J Dermatol 2014;24:41)
- Esophagus, vagina, cervix: scanty and weak staining in the basal layer of the squamous epithelium
- Gastrointestinal tract, fallopian tube, endometrium: scattered and weak staining in the basal layer of the epithelium and deep crypts
Positive staining - disease
- Various staining patterns in in situ and invasive carcinoma
- Positive nuclear stain in
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (Gut 2011;60:967)
- Cholangiolocellular carcinoma (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:364)
- Prostate carcinoma (J Clin Oncol 2006;24:268)
- Breast carcinoma (J Clin Oncol 2006;24:268)
- Melanoma (J Clin Oncol 2006;24:268)
- Malignant pleural / ascitic effusions (Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:118, Diagn Cytopathol 2014;42:111)
- Differentiate malignant mesothelioma (Histopathology 2017;70:722)
- Cholangiocarcinoma (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:364)
- Differentiate malignant hepatic tumors (Diagn Pathol 2012;7:86)
- Increased intensity of nuclear staining and ratio of positive cells in
- High grade urothelial carcinoma (Urol Oncol 2018;36:343.e1)
- Squamous cell carcinoma (Eur J Dermatol 2014;24:41)
- High grade neuroendocrine tumor of the small bowel (Lab Invest 2017;97:157)
Negative staining
- Adipose and soft tissue, brain, breast, gallbladder, liver, muscle, prostate
- Bile duct adenoma (negative) (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:364)
- Benign pleural / ascitic effusions (Diagn Cytopathol 2017;45:118, Diagn Cytopathol 2014;42:111)
- Benign mesothelial proliferation (Histopathology 2017;70:722)
Board review style question #1
A 56 year old woman complains of cough, fatigue and low fever for 3 months worsening in the past 2 days and is admitted to the emergency room. Chest Xray shows opacity in the right upper lobe and extensive effusion in the right lung. Thoracentesis reveals tan-yellow fluid containing scanty clusters of epithelioid cells forming 3 dimensional architecture, with slightly enlarged nuclei and prominent nucleoli in the background of extensive inflammation, neutrophil infiltration and degenerative changes. Which of the following immunostains support the diagnosis of a malignant effusion over a benign effusion in the cell block?
- MOC31 negative and EZH2 cytoplasmic staining
- MOC31 membranous and EZH2 nuclear staining
- MOC31 membranous and EZH2- staining
- MOC31 nuclear and EZH2 cytoplasmic staining
Board review style answer #1
B. MOC31 membranous and EZH2 nuclear staining support the diagnosis of malignant effusion over benign effusion.
Comment Here
Reference: EZH2
Comment Here
Reference: EZH2
