Thyroid & parathyroid

Cytology

Bethesda system

AUS


Deputy Editor-in-Chief: Andrey Bychkov, M.D., Ph.D.
Ayana Suzuki, Ph.D.

Last staff update: 19 August 2025 (update in progress)

Copyright: 2019-2025, PathologyOutlines.com, Inc.

PubMed Search: Atypia of undetermined significance

Ayana Suzuki, Ph.D.
Page views in 2025 to date: 8,038
Cite this page: Suzuki A. AUS. PathologyOutlines.com website. https://www.pathologyoutlines.com/topic/thyroidatypia.html. Accessed August 27th, 2025.
Definition / general
  • Bethesda category III, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is used for cases with a minor degree of atypia, primarily cytologic or architectural in nature, insufficient to qualify for either of the indeterminate categories (category IV - V) and higher
Essential features
  • AUS includes cases with few cells that have distinct but mild nuclear atypia or with more extensive but very mild nuclear atypia
  • Frequency: 1 - 20%
  • Resection rate: 43.0 - 64.7%
  • Risk of malignancy (ROM): 13 - 30%
  • Repeat fine needle aspiration (FNA) results in a more definitive cytologic interpretation (70 - 90%)
Terminology
  • AUS can be subdivided into AUS with nuclear atypia (AUS-N) and other atypia (AUS-O)
    • AUS-N: a low level of concern for papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) or noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP)
    • AUS-O: nonnuclear features result in an AUS interpretation
  • Follicular lesion of undetermined significance (FLUS), previously considered synonymous with AUS or often used as a synthetic term AUS / FLUS, was removed in the third edition to avoid confusion
Clinical features
Diagnosis
Case reports
Cytology description
  • AUS-N
    • Can be focal or can show most cells with mild nuclear atypia
    • Most of the aspirate appears benign but rare cells have
      • Nuclear enlargement
      • Pale chromatin
      • Irregular nuclear contours
      • No nuclear pseudoinclusions
  • Reference: Thyroid 2023;33:1039
Cytology images

Contributed by Ayana Suzuki, Ph.D.
AUS-N (nuclear atypia)

AUS-N (nuclear atypia)

AUS-O (architectural atypia)

AUS-O (architectural atypia)

AUS-O (oncocytic atypia)

AUS-O (oncocytic atypia)

AUS-O (atypical lymphoid cells)

AUS-O (atypical lymphoid cells)



Images hosted on other servers:
AUS-N (nuclear atypia) AUS-N (nuclear atypia)

AUS-N (nuclear atypia)

AUS-N (nuclear atypia) AUS-N (nuclear atypia)

AUS-N (nuclear atypia)


AUS-N (atypical cyst lining cells) AUS-N (atypical cyst lining cells) AUS-N (atypical cyst lining cells)

AUS-N (atypical cyst lining cells)

AUS-O (architectural atypia)

AUS-O (architectural atypia)

AUS-O (atypical lymphoid cells)

AUS-O (atypical lymphoid cells)

Explanatory notes
  • AUS is an interpretation of last resort and should be used judiciously
  • Specimen preparation artifacts may potentially raise concern for AUS
  • AUS with nuclear atypia is associated with papillary thyroid carcinoma (28 - 56%) (Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:572, Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:410)
    • Rare cells (< 20 cells) with enlarged, often overlapping nuclei, pale chromatin, irregular nuclear outlines and nuclear grooves
    • Well defined, intranuclear pseudoinclusions or psammomatous calcifications (more suspicious) (Acta Cytol 2008;52:320)
  • AUS subclassification in children also provides further risk stratification, similar to adults
Management
  • 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines recommend either repeat FNA or molecular testing (Thyroid 2016;26:1)
  • Molecular testing of AUS nodules can reduce the need for diagnostic surgery
  • 65 - 87% of AUS cases have a negative molecular testing result (architectural atypia > cytologic atypia)
    • Oncocytic AUS has a lower rate of gene expression classifier (GEC) benign results despite its very low risk of malignancy (Thyroid 2015;25:789)
    • Surgery versus continued observation is based on a synthesis of cytologic, molecular, clinical and radiologic findings as well as clinical risk factors and patient preference
    • NIFTP will diminish the overall risk of malignancy for AUS (Thyroid 2015;25:987, Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:181)
Videos

Atypical thyroid FNA

Head and tail of the Bethesda system for thyroid

Thyroid cytology - Bethesda classification

How to observe thyroid FNA

Sample pathology report
  • Thyroid, ultrasound guided FNA:
    • AUS-O (see comment)
    • Sparsely cellular aspirate comprised of follicular cells with microfollicular pattern colloid is absent
    • Comment: Repeat FNA or molecular testing may be helpful if clinically indicated.

  • Thyroid, ultrasound guided FNA:
    • AUS-N (see comment)
    • Follicular cells with mild nuclear irregularity
    • Comment: Repeat FNA or molecular testing may be helpful if clinically indicated.

  • Thyroid, ultrasound guided FNA:
    • AUS-N (see comment)
    • Follicular cells, predominantly benign appearing, with focal nuclear atypia
    • Comment: Repeat FNA or molecular testing may be helpful if clinically indicated.

  • Thyroid, ultrasound guided FNA:
    • AUS-O (see comment)
    • Numerous relatively monomorphic lymphoid cells
    • Comment: An additional aspiration, with apportioning of needle washout fluid for flow cytometry, may be helpful if clinically indicated.
Differential diagnosis
  • AUS-N
    • Extensive but mild cytologic atypia:
      • Many if not most cells have mildly enlarged nuclei with
        • Slightly pale chromatin
        • Only limited nuclear contour irregularity
        • No nuclear pseudoinclusions
    • Atypical cyst lining cells:
      • Cyst lining cells may appear atypical (rare cases), such as
        • Nuclear grooves
        • Prominent nucleoli
        • Elongated nuclei and cytoplasm
        • Rare intranuclear pseudoinclusions
      • Associated with hemosiderin laden macrophages
      • Reactive follicular or mesenchymal cells associated with cystic degeneration of thyroid nodules
      • Most cases are benign (Cancer 2005;105:71)
    • Histiocytoid cells:
      • Compared with histiocytes
        • Larger
        • Rounder nuclei
        • Higher N:C ratio
        • Harder (glassier) cytoplasm
        • Larger, discrete vacuoles without the hemosiderin or microvacuolization of histiocytes
      • Characteristic of cystic papillary thyroid carcinoma (Cancer 2002;96:240)
      • Immunostaining: keratins (papillary thyroid carcinoma cells), CD68 (histiocytes)
  • AUS-O
    • Architectural atypia:
      • Rare clusters with microfollicles or crowded 3 dimensional groups with scant colloid
        • Low risk
        • Follicular neoplasm diagnosis if the specimen were more cellular
      • 50 - 70% of follicular cells exhibit microfollicles but without a marked predominance
        • DICER1 mutated nodules may be associated with this pattern in pediatric samples
      • Focally prominent microfollicles with minimal nuclear atypia
        • More prominent than usual population of microfollicles but not sufficient for a diagnosis of follicular neoplasm
        • Should not be confused with an overall mixed but predominantly macrofollicular aspirate (benign)
    • Oncocytic atypia:
      • Sparsely cellular aspirate comprised of oncocytes with minimal colloid
        • Very low risk
        • Oncocytic follicular neoplasm diagnosis if the specimen were highly cellular
      • Markedly cellular sample composed of oncocytes with sparse colloid, yet the clinical setting suggests benign
        • Clinically suggesting lymphocytic thyroiditis or a multinodular goiter
        • More highly predictive of a hyperplastic oncocytic nodule than usual (Am J Clin Pathol 2011;135:139)
        • Specimens with oncocytes in cohesive flat sheets without nuclear atypia and abundant colloid indicate benign (if high risk clinical or radiologic findings are absent)
    • Atypia, not otherwise specified (NOS):
      • Minor population of follicular cells with nuclear enlargement and prominent nucleoli
        • Does not raise concern for papillary thyroid carcinoma and best classified as NOS
        • Specimens from patients with a history of radioactive iodine, carbimazole or other pharmaceutical agents can usually be diagnosed as benign
      • Psammomatous calcifications in the absence of follicular cells with nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma
        • Psammoma bodies raise concern for papillary thyroid carcinoma and should prompt careful scrutiny of papillary thyroid carcinoma cells
        • Lamellar bodies of inspissated colloid may be indistinguishable from true psammomatous calcifications
    • Atypical lymphoid cells, rule out lymphoma:
      • There is an atypical lymphoid infiltrate but the degree of atypia is insufficient for suspicious for malignancy
      • Repeat aspirate for flow cytometry is desirable
    • Parathyroid lesion:
Practice question #1
Which case belongs to architectural atypia?

  1. Atypical lymphoid infiltration
  2. Focally prominent microfollicles with minimal nuclear atypia
  3. Most of the aspirate appears benign but rare cells have irregular nuclear contours
  4. Psammomatous calcifications in the absence of nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma
  5. Sparsely cellular aspirate comprised of oncocytes with minimal colloid
Practice answer #1
B. Focally prominent microfollicles with minimal nuclear atypia. Microfollicles are architectural atypia, suggesting follicular neoplasm. Answer A is incorrect because atypical lymphoid infiltration belongs to atypical lymphoid cells. Answer C is incorrect because most of the aspirate appearing benign but rare cells having irregular nuclear contours belongs to nuclear atypia. Answer D is incorrect because psammomatous calcifications in the absence of nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) belongs to atypia, not otherwise specified. Answer E is incorrect because sparsely cellular aspirate comprised of oncocytes with minimal colloid belongs to oncocytic atypia.

Comment Here

Reference: AUS
Practice question #2

A 70 year old man underwent FNA for a thyroid nodule in the right lobe. A cytological image of the lesion is shown above. Which marker would most likely show positive staining?

  1. Calcitonin
  2. GATA3
  3. PAX8
  4. Thyroglobulin
  5. TTF1
Practice answer #2
B. GATA3. The lesion shown in the image is an intrathyroidal parathyroid adenoma. Answer A is incorrect because calcitonin is a marker for medullary thyroid carcinoma. Answers C, D, and E are incorrect because PAX8, thyroglobulin and TTF1 are markers for follicular cells.

Comment Here

Reference: AUS
Back to top
Image 01 Image 02