Epidemiology
Rare; mean 63 years, range 41 to 87 years, but younger patients have been reported
Most common malignant tumor involving the spermatic cord (46%) (Urol Oncol 2014;32:52)
Paratesticular liposarcomas account for ~12% of all liposarcomas
Well differentiated tumors tend to recur, often late, yet have a good outcome; dedifferentiated tumors have metastatic potential Sites
Usually arise from spermatic cord; also testicular tunica; rarely epididymisPathophysiology / etiology
Recurrent molecular abnormalities have been detected in liposarcomas, which differ between each subtype
Well differentiated liposarcoma is characterized by the presence of amplification involving 12q13-q15, which can be identified using FISH or CGH
- This amplification is associated with the occurrence of supernumerary ring chromosomes or giant rod chromosomes
- The 12q13-q15 region contains multiple genes implicated in the pathogenesis of liposarcoma, including MDM2, CDK4, HMGA2, TSPAN31, OS1, OS9, CHOP, STAT6 and GLI (Virchows Arch 2010;456:277, Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;24:30, Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995;14:8, Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1997;99:14, Mod Pathol 2014;27:1231)
Myxoid liposarcoma is characterized by the presence of t(12;16)(q13;p11), which results in the FUS-CHOP gene fusion that is present in over 95% of cases
- Most often, the amino terminal domain of FUS (also known as TLS) is fused to C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP, also known as DDIT3 or GADD153)
- In rare cases, an alternative translocation event is found, t(12;22)(q13;q12), that results in formation of the novel fusion oncogene where EWS takes the place of FUS
- RET, IGF1R and IGF2 are highly expressed in MLPS and promote cell survival through both the PI3K/Akt and Ras-Raf-ERK/MAPK pathways (Hum Pathol 2009;40:1244, Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2007;4:591) and represent potential therapeutic targets
Pleomorphic liposarcoma shows complex chromosomal abnormalities with gains in 1p, 1q21-q32,2q, 3p, 3q, 5p12-p15, 5q, 6p21, 7p, 7q22 and losses involving 1q, 2q, 3p, 4q, 10q, 11q, 12p13, 13q14, 13q21-qter, 13q23-24
Clinical features
Painless scrotal mass of longstanding duration is the most common presentation
Rarely is of recent duration
May present as an inguinal hernia, hydrocele, hematocoele or other testicular tumorDiagnosis
Diagnosis requires histological examination
Clinical differentiation from other testicular and paratesticular sarcomas is not possibleLaboratory
No specific laboratory abnormality is known
Serum markers for germ cell tumors and sex cord tumors are negativePrognostic factors
Recurrence of well differentiated paratesticular liposarcoma after complete resection is extremely rare (Malays J Med Sci 2013;20:95)
- Recurrence rate is < 10% when resection margin is 10mm or greater
- Risk factors for local recurrence/progression:
- High grade tumor morphology
- Large tumor size (>5cm)
- Inadequate/suboptimal resection
Treatment
Usual treatment is orchidectomy through inguinal approach, with adequate margins
Elective inguinal node dissection is not indicated
Cases with a margin <10 mm or with residual tumor may benefit from radiotherapy; liposarcoma is radiosensitive, and the well differentiated subtype is most sensitive
Radiotherapy also useful for unresectable cases
Role of chemotherapy (ex: doxorubicin) is debated; no clear benefit has been shown
Surgical excision is also the cornerstone of management of recurrent cases Clinical images
Non homogeneous right scrotal mass
No evidence of tissue infiltration
Large heterogenous extratesticular mass
Scrotal mass at presentation
Tumor after chemotherapy
CT of paratesticular liposarcoma presenting as hernia
Gross description
Tumors are usually large, appear to be relatively circumscribed
Cut surface may be yellow, fatty with interspersed fibrous septae, or may be uniformly firm and white
Areas of necrosis and hemorrhage may be seen in high grade tumors Gross images
Tumor mass
Yellow and myxoid areas
White-yellow to red-brown cut surface, marked necrosis
Right paratesticular mass with solid, yellow-white, fatty, myxoid areas
Grossly firm tumor
Microscopic (histologic) description
Mature adipocytes, atypical spindle cells and multivacuolated lipoblasts embedded in a loose myxoid to dense fibrous stroma
All variants of liposarcoma may be seen; well differentiated or dedifferentiated liposarcomas are most common
Heterologous leiomyosarcomatous or osteosarcomatous differentiation (Am J Surg Pathol 2002;26:742) and osseous metaplasia (Case Rep Urol 2015;2015:965876) have been reported, but their presence does not appear to affect prognosis
Pleomorphic liposarcoma accounts for <5% of cases, and is characterized by MFH-like histology with a disorderly pattern, pleomorphic cells, multinucleated bizarre giant cells and lipoblasts
Giant lipoblasts have enlarged globular or angular hyperchromatic nuclei
Other variants have also been reported Microscopic (histologic) images
Well differentiated liposarcoma
Atypical spindle cells and lipoblasts
Well differentiated with dedifferentiated component
Hypercellular stroma with atypical adipocytes
Atypical adipocytes with enlarged nuclei
Dedifferentiated liposarcoma
Dedifferentiated with leiomyosarcomatous component
H&E
MDM2+, CDK4+,
alpha smooth muscle actin+, desmin+
Myxoid liposarcoma
Lipoblasts contain lipid vacuoles
Plexiform arrangement of capillaries
Various images
Positive stains
MDM2, CDK4 (usually negative in myxoid/round cell and spindle subtypes)
S100
Heterologous elements may show positivity for desmin, actin, etc., based on the differentiation and dedifferetiated tumors have variable reactivity
STAT6 may rarely be positive (reported in dedifferentiated liposarcoma)